The First Amendment raising about income and whether its an appropriate place for that kind of level . Frankly, i would like to say that raising the ami level for Group Housing to 90 ami is quite ludicrous. If you take 60,000, which was quoted as the ami level, or the income level for someone at 90 , divided that by 12 for 12 months, divided by a third, you would be expected to pay 1777 a month for Group Housing situation. So if i could have the overhead slide, if possible . So you are saying fernando, you are saying that 1700 is unreasonable for group house that anybody should pay . What i have got on the slide . Overhead, sfgovtv. Down a little bit. What is the new panoramic, which is about to open micro units a little bit above that 90 level. If you want to share a house in nob hill its just above 90 ami. Just to say that is fine right now. As soon as the market changes the Mayors Office of housing will be stuck trying to rent an ami unit when Group Housing may be going for somethin
Nob-hill
California
United-states
San-francisco
Fernando-martin
First-amendment
Level-group
Group-housing
Unreasonable-group
Group-house
Mayors-office
Office-housing