inviting states, all 50 of them, with respect to their unpreferred constitutional rights to try to nullify the law that this court has laid down as to the content of those rights. i mean, that wassing? that until this law came along, no state dreamed of doing. and essentially, we would be like we re open you re open for business. there is nothing the supreme court can do about it. guns, same-sex marriage, religious rights, whatever you don t like, go ahead. well, meanwhile conservative justices brett kavanaugh and coney barrett signalled they would be open to challenge the law. his cabinet echoing some of kagan s concerns. it could be free speech rights, it could be free exercise of religion rights, it could be second amendment rights if this position is accepted here, the theory of the amicus
essentially, we would be inviting states all 50 of them with respect to their unpreferred constitutional rights to try to nullify the law this court has laid down as to the content of those rights. i mean, that was something that until this law came along, no state dreamed of doing. and essentially, we would be like you know, we re open for you re open for business. there is there s a there s nothing the supreme court can do about it. guns, same-sex marriage, religious rights. whatever you don t like, go ahead. okay. so, i want to hear from our senior-legal analyst, laura coates, about this. laura, good evening to you. what do you think of what justice kagan said? her warning? justice kagan s absolutely right. i mean, this would be the definitive slippery slope. we often hear about this could be a slippery slope. it might have a domino effect. if you allow states to be able
liberal supreme court justices warning that constitutional rights enshrined in supreme court decisions on gun rights, same-sex marriage, birth control and other issues could be open to attack depending how the court handles the texas abortion ban case. listen to justice kagan. essentially, we would be inviting states, all 50 of them, with respect to their unpreferred constitutional rights to try to nullify the law that this court has laid down as to the content of those rights. i mean, that was something that until this law came along no state dreamed of doing, and essentially we would be like you know, we are open for you re open for business. there is nothing the supreme court can do about it. guns, same sex marriage, religious rights, whatever you don t like, go ahead. okay. so i want to hear from our