, a have recovered, one has passed away. There have been nine in america. 13,005 hundred and west africa. The situation is serious. It means that all of government has to respond in a way to do so. My strong suggested principles of this, first we must fight the disease at its epicenter in west andca, in liberia, guinea sierra leone. We also want to look at countries near these areas where it has not spread. We want to use the expertise of the department of state, usaid, nih, fda, any Government Agency that can play our role in making the world, with africa, and america safe. That is what we want to do. The second principle is we must protect america. We must do it at our points of entry. Finally, we need to utilize the best science and a ploy of Public Health agencies in a way that is effective. That is for the cdc, our state and local Health Departments, scientists developing vaccines and treatments at nih and approving their safety and efficacy at fda. As we look at what government w
National standards for not only the equipment but the training so that we have a National Response regardless of whether where someone might appear that needs help . Could you share with us and did you respond or did the president respond to the National Nurses united request . So, with regard to the issue of make something you are that our Health Care Workers were prepared, i think we need to think about it in a number of different levels. The first is in that screening and monitoring and thats what state and local Health Care Workers are doing, with then checking on the people who have come from these countries. Second is that that initial front line worker, in a Health Care Institution that needs to be able to detect and isolate, ask the right question. If off fever what is your travel history . The next is the level where treatment will occur and as we describe in our submission, this will be in a more state by state basis and where the cases are in terms of treatment. The question
The question was, should the United States for the first time in history attempt prior restraint publication . Someone who believes he has good civil liberties, my instinct was absolutely not. I looked at what was going to be published. We had what we called tickets. I would not have had clearance for this kind of stuff and thermonuclear weapons and it was going to come out in a magazine. We knew how long it took the french to go from fission diffusion. Fission to fusion. This was an arms important. This was enormously important. Thermonuclear weapons was put out in the open literature. Hear thats whenever i hear that a country has claimed that it has successfully detonated a thermonuclear weapon and you read that our judgment is, no, not really. Im happy about that. Because the level of destruction damaging, ith more makes a difference. In the terms of deterrence theory, i would say not much. Not much. Thank you all very much. [applause] today begins the open enrollment for those want
Of the overall population would not really matter. I just wanted to make that clear. You need to identify yourself. This is ann fulton with hewitt. Claim audit process. This is a review again from what we reviewed during our audit process. There were questions in our out of sample claim. This is an example, an emergency room claim if we identified an error in subsequent xray claim, that would be considered out of sample. We had a question on why we stratify our sample, the size really impacts the claim process egg processes utilized. The large claims have more control in place. You have administrators doing predisbursement audit and doing claim reveals and medical necessity reviews. The lower dollars are automated with the processes. We find that the side of the claim there are different characteristics as a result of the size of the claim. So we felt like we needed to break out and look at payment thresholds. That is why we needed to stratify the different claims in processing and we
5061 for adjustment and recovery and are pending reimbursement. Is any of this provided to us in writing . Yes. Its included in ann hewitts report. Its not in the analysis what you told us in terms of how many claims and the dollar values. Is that included somewhere in it is. Its included in the last column in the tables pages 1112 estimated Group Financial impact. Its the column. And the na is because you have determined its annoy a systemic error. Thats right. Its an error that we did not agree with or an error due to process or which was not systemic repeatable. I just want to make clear if you disagreed you did not do a Financial Analysis even though our auditors continue to disagree with you. You just said is we dont agree and we are not going to show you the numbers. Correct. If we did not agree, we did not run a corrective analysis. We appreciate your opinion on the matter and would like to see the numbers on this. For future we would like to see them, totally we understand reas