hard want to do because once you do it, you gotta keep doing here. monday. how about that? all right. sounds good. and be sure to watch speaking of which cnn special coverage of the eclipse across america starting monday 1:00 p.m. eastern or stream it on max, a new our of cnn news central starts right now all right breaking news, waffle, new number is just in from the new jobs report way higher than expected. the unemployment rate dropped, no recession in sight it justin israeli military releases initial findings into the strike that killed seven world central kitchen aid workers, where the idf is placing the blame. i m john berman with kate bolduan and sara sidner. this is cnn news central all right breaking news coming in hot red hot the economy added 303,000 jobs in march. way way higher than expectation. cnn s matt egan is with us now, mac give us a sense of these numbers and what it means john, this is another blockbuster jobs report and i gotta give you
4.8 magnitude earthquake hitting the northeast was shaking, felt across several states travel is now being impacted in an around new york city was mistaken identification and errors in decision-making that from the israel defense forces, newly released initial findings into the airstrikes that killed seven aid workers in gaza. we re going to tell you how the idf is responding and the biden administration s reaction to the report. numbers from from the new jobs report and come in way higher than expected. there are they so high that the federal reserve might scrap planned interest rate cuts were following these major developing stories and many more all coming in right here to cnn news central we re following breaking news out of the northeast are rare, 4.8 magnitude earthquake shaking the tri-state area today, the epicenter was in new jersey, but people felt shaking as far north as main all the way down to the washington, dc area? yeah. the good news is the right now at
addition to being chief white house correspondent for the teams. when this law was passed and given that there were so many, you know, republican attempts to invalidate it, the fact that it has withstood three times now with the supreme court, i can t imagine anyone thinking that would be the case ten years ago when this law was passed. that s right, exactly. it shows, though, how problematic it is when you pass major social welfare changes with only one party s support, though, right? social security, medicare, medicaid, the history of these big advances in american social safety net basically show that you had at least some bipartisan support along the way under fdr, under lbj. president obama couldn t get that support when he passed it with vice president biden at his side, so they went ahead with basically entirely democratic support. it just meant it would be a partisan issue for years to
around, that this may be the most normal thing donald trump does as president, that under fdr, under lbj and richard nixon, you stay i line. and you were called out if you weren t. they didn t use quite the levers of power that he uses to do it. but this is a president thing. yes. although i would sayyeah, 100%, we ve seen presidents of both parties try to enforce loyalties in various ways and exact some kind of political cost. usually it would not be a president on whose future in th maintaining control of the house, making it his political situation leable. usually you would pick a place where the cost to yourself would be less severe potentially. that s one the other thing is that, you know, you look at a guy like mark sanford. usually the kind of deviations would be of loyalty or ideology. you would see somebody who s supposed to be a member of your party voting with the other party, for instance.
most normal thing donald trump does as president, that under fdr, under lbj and richard nixon, you had to stay in line. and you were called out if you weren t. they didn t use quite the levers of power that he uses to do it. but this is a president thing. yes. although i would say yeah, 100%, we ve seen presidents of both parties try to enforce loyalties in various ways and exact some kind of political cost. usually it would not be a president on whose future in the office depends on his party maintaining control of the house, making it his political situation less tenable. usually you would pick a place where the cost to yourself would be less severe potentially. that s one thing. the other thing is that, you know, you look at a guy like mark sanford. usually the kind of deviations would be of loyalty or ideology. you would see somebody who s supposed to be a member of your party voting with the other party, for instance. mark sanford is a conservative. he s voted with donald trump