the dozens of criminal charges he is now facing. i want to say that again. unanimously! that means his lawyer stood up in front of the entire panel of erudite judges, they made their best legal arguments, and when it was all said and done each of them told him, beat it! but now, ladies and gentlemen, the supreme court has entered the chat. that part actually did appear to go very well for the twice impeached, four times indicted, ex president. on thursday, the supreme court heard more efforts in an effort to disqualify the ballot based on saying three of the 14th amendment of the constitution. that seemed to be a step too far for most of the nine justices on the bench. judging from their lines of questioning, they appear skeptical of the case as a whole, and hesitant about the precedent that this could create. while trump probe peers likely to prevail in this case, he still has plenty of legal troubles ahead. there is another case already knocking at the supreme court stores.
raising two kids in the city. deeply concerned that city hall is allowing crime and lawlessness to spread. now we can do something about it by voting yes on prop e. a common sense solution that ensures we use community safety cameras to catch repeat offenders and hold them accountable. vote yes on e. xfinity rewards presents: 1st and 10gs. xfinity is giving away ten grand to a new lucky winner for every first and ten during the big game. enter daily through february 9th for a chance to win 10gs. with the ultimate speed, power, and reliability the xfinity 10g network is made for streaming live sports. because it s only live once. join xfinity rewards on the xfinity app or go to xfinity1stand10gs.com for your chance to win. this is cnn breaking news. a furious president biden is now being forced to confront a key vulnerability facing his 2024 re-election bid, his age. special counsel robert hur released a scathing report on biden s handling of classified documents, and wh
we re gonna have more on that soon. in 2017, when he had classified material in your advocacy here, and in the presidents counsel writing back to mr. burr, you are saying that there were gratuitous comments, that there were false pieces of information. how is the american public supposed to process this, when we also live in a world where former president trump asserts that there was a politicized process that resulted in his prosecution related to classified documents, and other things? so for the public, if democrats and this administration say trust the department of justice, trust the institutions, but you are also arguing here, gratuitous political cheap shots and false assertions. how are they to process? this while i talked with this actually a minute ago, and i think when you have the former attorney general, when you have the former acting fbi director, when you have the former general counsel of the fbi. these are experienced people at the justice depart
every minute of the russian military staying at the nuclear plant is a risk of global radiation disaster. live from london, this is cnn newsroom with max foster. it is friday, august 26, 9:00 a.m. here in london, 4:00 in washington where the u.s. justice department has about eight hours to release the redacted affidavit. they typically contain crucial information about why investigators want to search the property and what potential crimes that they are looking for. judge reinhart agreed with the justice department that certain portions of the document should remain sealed. quote, disclosure would reveal number one the identities of the witnesses, law enforcement agents and uncharged parties. number two, the investigation strategy direction, scope, sources and methods, and three, grand jury information. this comes as we are learning that there is growing concern inside trump s inner circle that his legal team is less than qualified. sources tell cnn the former president
we are standing by to review that affidavit as soon as it comes out, which could be this hour. let s begin this hour with cnn justice correspondent jessica schneider. jess, this affidavit could be released any moment, sometime between now and noon. walk us through this whole process, what we will see, what we probably won t see. yeah, in i minute now, guys. what s interesting about this is it s all been a relatively rapid process. you know, it was less than four hours after the doj submitted their proposed redactions that the judge ruled, yes, in fact, he would accept that proposal and it would be released to the public. like you said, in just two hours here. and what s notable is that the judge seems to be agreeing with what the doj has proposed, despite the fact that what we saw in court just about a week ago was doj pushing back substantially against the judge, saying even if they issued a redacted version of this affidavit, they said that there would be so many redactio