should believe even in absence of evidence. and it then tells you about what conduct you should have in the fact of that belief system, okay? insights you can put forth an idea that does it have evidence, but everybody is looking for evidence. and if we cannot generate evidence for it, then it ultimately which is simply be discarded or put on a show. so evidence matters in this. so if you want to call it a religion with evidence, okay, that s just a very fresh usage of the word religion in your vocabulary. i don t debate words with people. i don t value time invested in debating definitions. just tell me how you are using the word and i will tell you whether what it agrees with. if you re using the word religion in a way that allows evidence to define what his people inc., say and do, then fine, it s all religion because that s what sites does. it finds evidence that the find and discover the truth of the world. that s just not simply how anybody else in the world is using th
primary meanis theprimary meansl information about the universe not even knowing 160 around 1600 was the invention of the microscope in one direction and a telescope in the other direction. it s like doing the backstroke that your sensory systemed wouldn t detect it were it not for the microscope and you could think if that made sense to have entire living creatures inside a drop of water. it s what you normally do when you make a discovery and they thought he was drinking too much gin. they were in denial which is a natural thing to happen. one eyewitness testimony to confirm if it s real and then we discover quantum physics how it falls completely outside of not only the sentences but our expectations for how anything should work. how can everything be expandinga at all.st host: what is significant about the year 1600? s a guest:. you open up the floodgates when you combine lenses and they made a discovery back and the sky is the limit.n a host: there s guest: there
host: dr. neil degrasse tyson did your new book astrophysics for people in a hurry you open by saying the universe is under no obligation to make sense what does that mean?. i think up until the year 1600 when we had no particular tools to investigate the natural world the five senses were the primary means we gave all information about the universe and not even knowing that our five senses had live and said everything you know, the thinking of letting tries to give you but it is not better run at 1500 it would go one direction than the telescope it was a decade within one another now it becomes available to us to transcend our senses to look inside a drop of pond water to see microorganisms doing the backstroke that the sensory system could not have detected with not for the microscope so the welcome to the universe tire living creatures living in a drop of water but today we know that from childhood but that made no sense at all without royal society in london when t