, so the first step is to promote us the people to get documents from these legal capacities that are actually provided now and the emphasis that the Supreme Leader said to discredit normal documents. I have to invite our compatriots in these settlements they can use the capacity of the property determination law to the departments. Go to the documents and request the documents. Those who have normal documents whose origins are actually clear, possession documents, i invite them to go to the facility. Udrc. Ir in the Correction System of bazar fini shahri company and register to get the document. Unfortunately, we have the highest level of instability in the marginal areas , more than 53 of the buildings are unstable and the lives of our compatriots are in danger, so this is my request. There are people who rush to get a document first, and when they get a document, they can get a permit and it will fade like a tissue. Use this incentive discussion and raise their own share in the deve
A room or a basement or a seller and wait for 3 days, and then jump house again. Indeed, it appears that that was positive. How much is planned that some of these small groups of minutes is with go to ground and then come out later . So suspects will be saying this in the coming days, suddenly these barrels response sofa has been a strikes on the list from us targets in does a, how effective is this type of Ministry Power against an organizer from low ton boss . So not very so as to how much, you know, insurgent organizations tend to be decentralized and operates in sales. And that quite castle to mosque that communications. I mean, clearly they were able to plan this attack without these rileys knowing. I guess i draw your view is attention to the activities of western countries in iraq. And ive done this on either. The last 20 is they relied very heavily on app, how to try and defeats and sergeant organizations. And they didnt have very much success, insurgencies or human problems on
Founder of Common Good Foundation and come to alliance. And a catholic clergyman. Im also on the path towards ph. D in my own church. Its my honor to stand with all of you ended in order to be part of this putsch piggybacked pastor rick, i dont drop it was intentional but it is certainly good optics because im standing with the thousands in fact standing with millions and im standing in a 2000 year history of the Christian Church reaching beyond that to mount sinai go all the way back to the beginning of creation itself. And defending marriage is what it is. Between one man and one woman, intended for life open to life and formative of family. And family is the first society. Its the first school, the first church the first government come the first economy, the first mediating association. The entire social order is built on the family. And i stand fully within the tradition of my church and the fact that classical christian tradition in saying it is not just a religious position i am
Whatever happened to abraham lincolns pronouncement in the gettysburg address at hours that the government of the people, by the people and for the people. We make the decisions for ourselves. It is rapidly being replaced now by a government of the courts, by the courts and for the courts. Let me get to the bottom line. If the u. S. Supreme Court Redefines Marriage to an good samesex marriage, we all know you and i all know that this will not be the end of the matter. An avalanche of court cases will be filed unrelated issues that we can even imagine today. We believe or should i say i believe that religious liberty will be insolvent from every side. Indeed, that authority happened. Pastors may have to officiate samesex marriages and they could he prohibited from passages of scripture. Those who refuse to comply will likely be threatened legally and as the years go by, some will be subjected to prison sentences. Christians who operate as mrs. Will be required to dance to the government
Hard to think of any other kind of law where you can discriminate in that type of rational way. It doesnt lend itself to the economic regulation. The proponents of the amendment in the perry case, the natural argument and the things that got the attorney justice appeased, and they made a joke about it. They werent taking this argument particularly seriously. Theres been a lot of focus on the Supreme Court decisions but theres a real history that the court has had in addressing access to marriage that includes permitting people who dont pay Child Support to be able to marry, permitting individuals who are prison to be able to marry while they are in prison. There is this really huge issue that the Supreme Court has viewed marriage over 40 times over a couple hundred years. The court has consistently found that we have to give huge to individuals who are willing to marry. Theyre not interested in picking out who should and should not have access to the institution. The other piece of thi