evidence. there s a legal element thatnylv is not met by any evidence. hav they would have to prove that donald trump would have no reason other than the election to try to resolve this issue.wih with stormy daniels privately and outside of the public sphere. and , of course,privately an there arerse,privately plenty of reasons he would dou so so it s an obvious affirmative defensnspublice. o what i think will happen next, a motion to dismiss. and if this were evehappenr to be tried, you certainly could not do it in manhattan. you would likely seeu could a e of venue. with uue. upstate new york would maybe s be the only place donald trump could get a fair trial. thi but what i expect is that this will be resolved well beforey ao that by any court that looks at the way that the law is being aa tortured in the absence of anybe charge, it would plane be maintainable against any human being on the planet earth. eartother than donald trump.t tm and against trump, itp it is clearly political