was correct it was a political master stroke to release that list. it was important to the republicans to energize them. he sees that list as partly responsible for his victory. bret: he is not wrong. not wrong about that. now he cease the practical effects of the court. he learned that this week and particularly over the travel ban. you had liberal courts stymieing the travel ban and it wasupled bu the supreme court. trump knows the political force of the decision and the practical agenda force of this decision. bret: and he wrote a list, that s right. there is nothing democrats can do. other than trip up a potential candidate. no. by any schedule there ought to be someone confirmed by governor. november.
today. sandra: shannon bream outside the courthouse for us. judge andrew napolitano is with us live as the supreme court has upheld the trump travel ban. your reaction, judge. you know, the lower federal courts in california, sandra, kept harping on the words of the president when he was a candidate. and the discenters went on it. the supreme court majority said today we don t care what he said as a candidate. we only care what he wrote as the president. and when he wrote this executive order, he cited his authority under the constitution to formulate the foreign policy of the nation and to secure the nation s borders. and he cited the statute that congress gave him which permits
they conclude it s not discriminatory. unusually today, two of the descenders who summarized their disends from the bench. it s a sign of the passion on this decision. as a practical matter, it goes back to hawaii for a trial, but the supreme court has just set this bar very high. going to make it extremely difficult for the challengers to prevail. i think as a practical matter, the trump travel ban has survive third down legal challenge. when the two comments were made, was there anything in there that was notable other than the fact that they do not agree with the majority opinion? they talk a lot about the signal this sends. they emphasize the fact that this did appear to be born of religious discriminatory intent and they say the supreme court didn t pay enough attention to that. i will say that toward the end of the term and we now know tomorrow is the last day.
incidents. let me also say, free speech is certainly. but that s a separate challenge for the court. let me say the democrat leadership on capitol hill should be called to task on this, too because this is their party and this is what they are spreading and this is becoming more pervasive and it s very, very dangerous. we are headed into a dangerous area as a country. a lot of agreement on both sides about that issue. good to see you. still ahead, a big day for president trump travel ban next week is the supreme court is expected to make a decision on the case very soon. president trump has kind words for north korea and cater kim jong un. of the north korean are having an impact in asia. it s been an incredible experience for me.
information going forward. i think what s important is they will have the clarify of knowing you need a search warrant in these instances and the court made the point of saying that in exgent circumstances it s not required. one other important thing the court said they really had a narrow ruling this would only be required if the data was going to be looked at for more than seven days. in the case at hand it was 127 days. i think there was enough narrowing that will enable law enforcement to continue to yuds this technique while respecting the privacy interest of the individuals involved. for the little guy in our audience right now, the supreme court not done yet for this session. we know we re waiting on ruling in the days ahead. what s the big one you ll be watching out for? trump travel ban. also a question about public sector unions. the court could deal them a huge