Stay updated with breaking news from Trump officia. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Between connection of qatar and trump administration thanks for being here. thanks for having me. this story is nuts. and i spent almost all of the first almost all of the amount of time reading about it thinking this was a publicity stunt that was dropping names and provocative allegations just to get attention to this basketball league then we got confirmation from this qatari official saying he was involved with meeting with trump officia officials, what do you think is important about this story? there s a lot of moving parts on this timeline and true qatar keep popping up in various weird moments. let s start briefly with the steel dossier which alleged there was going to be a plan to sell 19% of this giant oil ....
Story. the moment this scandal was unmasked, the media is trying to change the subject, destroy anybody and everybody connected to it. that s what they tried to do to congressman devin nunes. adam schiff on the intel committee has seen the same surveillance and, guess what? all of a sudden his grandstanding, it all stopped. in fact, listen to what he said this weekend when asked about if there was a connection between president trump and russia. can you say definitivety that there was collusion, there were people affiliated with the trump campaign who are working with russians to time the release of damaging information about hillary clinton that had been hacked either from john podesta or the dnc? i don t think we can say anything definitively at this point. we are still at the very early stage of the investigation. sean: yeah, for the past eight months. we re in the early stages of the investigation. with help of the all left ....
Propaganda destroy trump media, they ve been trying everything they can do to find proof that president trump and his campaign were cluing with russia. yet there s no evidence after eight long months. the big question is this. did president obama and his administration knowingly surveil on either incoming president or an opposition party candidate? americans tonight are demanding answers to those questions and we here on hannity will demand those as well until we get them. joining us now jay secula, host of justice with janine piro and the host of you are the jury. so, i am trying to lay the history out here. give me any scenario under which susan rice, national security adviser, would specifically request raw intelligence unmasking, let s say the intelligence was legitimate against russia, china, iran, doesn t matter. americans are caught up in a ....
Democrats would be screaming for full accountability, immediate testimony on capitol hill. sean: do you get the sense that this was orchestrated sabotage of either a candidate, an opposition party candidate, and a president-elect? then we ll come on the other side and get more detail. the fact that she initially denied it and then in her response today to andrea mitchell gave a double negative. she said she leaked nothing to nobody. well, she went to harvard. she knows that s a double negative so that means the affirmative. i m nit picking here. sean: she did admit the unmasking of michael flynn but not for political purposes. she said she didn t leak it either. sean: somebody did. that s a felony. for with laura ingram, we con our investigation. let s look at the destroy trump media doing all they can to put their spin on this or just not cover it at all. ....
This wasn t an incidental accident, i want to know who usa one is, u.s. person one. it s president trump or president-elect trump at that point or one of his associates. but then she wants more. as it gets closer, it s more. here s the political question. why are we saying it s okay to be spying on i don t want to even call it surveillance. spying. it s not okay. you ve got the making of a false statement, espionage, violation of the fisa act. what s significant here is the fact that if obama knew about all this, nobody seems to care. this goes right to the timeline until it looked like oh my god, they re taking him seriously, now what we need to do, we got to get the dirt. we got to pass it around. that s when they started. sean: the bottom line here, under the guise of national security, if they re unmasking only the conversations with trump or trump transition team members or then candidate trump s team, that was ....