fully cooperating, because the trump administration s modus operandi has never been to cooperate. while executive privilege has been thoroughly destroyed, as an argument for trump including by supreme court decision that was 8 to 1. i am sure these people will come up with other privileges they will make up attorney client privilege, or this or that, or the other thing if they want to. and if that is what trump orders them to do. it is a little weird because the white house counsel is someone who actually maybe trying to break with trump a little bit. there are some signs of that. there is also some weird text from sean hannity, that congress has saying she pony threatened to resign. it might show that cipollone did threaten to resign. it that sean hannity has ever tried to investigate the real story. thank you very much for
from a state in the south. it s because of trail blazers like him. and obviously, detail is fully wagging the dog over there in terms of the house republicans. and the extremes are in charge. and they got a hold of didn t even understand. and what do i mean by that, the judge in this case was all in supreme court president, lawrence, you know what that means. when you are an appeals court judge in the ruling comes to you, you have to follow mandatory precedent that s controlling this case. he is following president and so they decide they re going to pieces one piece of information to try and overturn would as you said passed the senate unanimously. and there is no judge in history who has served on any bench where any party or politician would be able to say, we agree fully with every single ruling that judge has ever made. that s right. i mean, that s going to be the standard and how are we going to have any judges that we re going to go back in a reviewer.
the new york times tonight from one source saying that donald trump authorized them to meet with the committee? yeah. so it isn t surprising as a congressional committee has called them. they are obviously critical witnesses. and the new york times story says that trump authorized the quote, engagement of these two attorneys. i don t know what that means with respect to engage in congress. i doubt it means that they are fully cooperating, because the trump administration s modus operandi has never been to cooperate. while executive privilege has been thoroughly destroyed, as an argument for trump including by supreme court decision that was 8 to 1. i am sure these people will come up with other privileges they will make up attorney client privilege, or this or that, or the other thing if they want to. and if that is what trump orders them to do. it is a little weird because the white house counsel is someone who actually maybe trying to break with trump a little bit. there are some
of texas. he is a former civil rights attorney. thank you very much for joining us tonight. can you convince me that racism rife within or vulcan party on the house floor that they had nothing to do with this vote? yeah, i don t think i can convince you have that. i just want to say that s because of votes like judge hatchett that we re having a conversation right now. that i became an attorney, i was able to serve in congress from a state in the south. it s because of trail blazers like him. and obviously, detail is fully wagging the dog over there in terms of the house republicans. and the extremes are in charge. and they got a hold of didn t even understand. and what do i mean by that, the judge in this case was all in supreme court president, lawrence, you know what that means. when you are an appeals court judge in the ruling comes to you, you have to follow mandatory precedent that s controlling this case. he is following president and so they decide they re going to pieces