Stay updated with breaking news from Trump hatinga. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
now if you re paying attention any attention to liberal you comments made post-verdict you would have noticede hear thu were hearing not so subtle warnings of maga uprising. trump and his maga followersi are digging in, trying to tear w down the system. he s perfectly willing to call out the mob, basically, and them attack all these people and threaten their safety. there s going to be violence, b there s going to be trouble. this is wrong. there s going to b herbee some maybe some violence. and this president, former president, should not have done what he did. i don t think he has a problem with the concept of violence. seems now, why would they all say this seems almost coordinated? after all, they won the battle,s at least convicting trump.e flas that was their dream. so what s their motive for, fanning the flames now? well, since they can t credibly argurediblgue thate that you reu than you were four years ago, they need more than just lawfare to win november. ....
The biden administration th sog toheir cases are so weak. they need that coordination. they need the soros backing to get it done. gewell, alan, do you thinkf ju the system no longer worksat the of these types of jury charges that the judge handed? that was quite broad, quite lengthy, took an hour and read 40 minutes to read to the jury, but they they tookto jury. enoua of what michael cohen said as gospel to infegospel cr upon your client with the novel application of a law. it s never been used in this way before in any jurisdictionjd . diction in the united states. ke yes, i do. i think we re broken right now. i think our judicialroken ri isr supposed to be intervened by political ambitionsve. i think that when that happens, when you have a a judge who s a trump hatinga tr j judge, fra. who happens to get steve bannon s case, happens to getppens to allen weisselber, my former client s case, gets it again, puts him back in jaijl and then gets donald trump s case. i think we got a p ....
At reversal. joining me now, saul eisenberg, fox news contributofr ,former deputy independent counsel, and chris landau, former supreme court lawnd clerk and former ambassador to mexico. chris let s start with you here. you re an appellate litigator. you ve argued many cases before the supreme court. what is the appellate process? state first in a possible federal move as? well. sure. well, in new york, like manys l states has a three tiered justice system. the trial court, wheret coon the conviction was just or the jury very good just held. then there was intermecourt in court of appeals. you have an appeal as of right to that court, and thenk you have a state supreme court in new york. it s called the court courppeals tses on that takes cm on a discretionary basis. and then you cane go to the u.o supreme court if you have federal issues. but i thin be k right now we gos to be talking not about just the eventual appeal going now i to drag on well beyond the election. i think the ....
And does the how are the compelling federal interests in having a candidate for president of the united states break free of the constraints, judge merchan. i mean, there should be.e it seems to me a basis for a federal claim that a state cannot hold a candidate for president. united states basically hostage hostage in a new york courtroom. saul. this is a fascinating question. and i know we ve all talkefascid about this. you ve had so much experience e in litigatioxperiein youn in yor as well. the court does not like to touch political questions. they re very concerned about the reputation. the court certainly justice roberts is all of them. but in this case this is extraordinary and historic. does that give impetus to the court to step in where they might not have wanted to and in another event? i think it would be an incredible long shot ifcredib ....