Everyone i am Laura Ingraham an. This is the Ingraham Angle from washington Tonight Pure Lawfare loses again tonight and that is the focus of tonights a angle. For years they leathosd themsel, their viewers and all those suffering from tds, Front Duriny Syndrome down the garden path. Ai once they bring to january 6 as an insurrection, they believe they were off to the races here and so it was multiple attacks against trump using insurrection as a foundation that result in him losing her in the colorado case, they thought he would never be on the ballot at all. He basically incited an insurrection at then. United states capitol. Donald trump inside of this insurrection. He wanted it ttorao happen. E he wanted to stop. You should read the constitution as it is writtenp o but instead he should be removed from office, trump with a 14th amendment. Lauraey today, the faces told the story. They look like they had lost hef best friends. And they sounded defeated. Y their body i guess its thn s
All right. Yes, yes, i know. I know. I would feel the same way if i were you. All right, lets get started. According to storm. Get stard. Y daniels husband, the couple will leave the united states. Trump wins the trial. So wait a second. She has a husband. Upplen thats like Finding Outes the easter bunny has syphilis. Oh, my god. What if somebody have syphilis in here . Im sorry i offended you. And get this. Her husbands a star, too. I wonder, do they talk shop at home . I bet he complains when he doesnt have. A hard day at work. Wow. Im not jim gaffigan. This is going to be is it goingy to be clean comedy . So theyre actually going to be leaving the united states,he which means stormy is going to enter another country as Opposedited Stamean to anotht entering her. Sorry. Odonn Rosie Odonnell reportedly sent a text to Michael Cohen , breathe, relax, tell, tell the truth. Thu got. I love you. Ate thats the same advice she gives herself when strapping on the feed bag. Executives abc are
Country. The administration has worked with the Committee Staff to observe 11 cpb holding facilities, 13 i. C. E. Detention facilities and six state licensed that contract. Good evening, im Chris Matthews in washington where tonight were watching history in the making as the House Judiciary Committee debates articles of impeachment against donald trump. Votes are expected to take place any moment now. Lets listen in. The committee threatened witnesses that and i quote, any failure to appear, any failure to appear in response to a mere letter requesting their presence for a deposition shall and i quote constitute evidence of obstruction. This is just letters, not subpoenas. In letters to the State Department employees, the committee threatened to witnesses that if they insist on
having Agency Counsel present to protect the Executive Branch in their Confidentiality Interests or if they make any effort to protect Confidentiality Interests at all, these officials would have their salaries
Over the head with them in the election and not allow an acquittal. does that strategy work? is that a possibility? it s not a possibility. as i mentioned the senate trial has to commence as a constitutional duty. the senate has to proceed. i believe she will blink. if she doesn t, they think they will proceed with a trial without her. it s not just about trump.ed it s about the constitution and misusing the impeachment power and not only impeding the ability of the president too function but enormous disrespect of a senate that is being manifested here. the behavior of the speaker is deplorable. this is from chuck schumer.. he s making an argument that this is about due process. mitch mcconnell said it s not the senate s job to do the house s business which is to prove the case.. they should not have to bring up more witnesses. t watch this.
Leader because he knew he couldn t trust the other ones. they were supporting hillary clinton. they were corrupt. why would he talk to them about helping root out the corruption? so to say this was all about biden, for heavens sake that s ridiculous. but my friend from ohio s amendment puts our friends to the test. is it really about trying to correct what you say was an unfair election, which we know now from the horowitz report it was unfair but it was from the democrats side, from the trump ed had a haters side. so if that s really the case let s strike the part that says he can t run for office again or be re-elected again. wouldn t that be helpful for democrats if you made it reasonable like that, or do you want to continue to persist in making it so personal that it s walk off the plank time for anybody that tries to be reasonable about what s going on here? so we will see, but it s a good