only been here since 1947, san francisco beautiful. 40 years ago we helped lead the way in preserving lower height limits on our bay. and we re really glad to see this program come along. i personally will be proposing to san francisco beautiful we buy some of these bricks. the first brick will be to name in honor of cruise man, the founder of our organization in 1947. she kept the city from ripping out its cable car system. and in the last 15 years, more like 30 years, we ve been one of the organizations taking a lead in fighting the excessive commercialization. it was oscar wild who said if the sen can knows the price of everything in the value if nothing. we know the port commission has worked so hard and endeavored so hard to maintain this jewel among san francisco, a jewel among the world class cities. thank you. thank you. is there any other public comment? commissioners? any questions, comments? i want to thank the staff and appreciate the effort that s gone into t
is there any other public comment? commissioners? any questions, comments? i want to thank the staff and appreciate the effort that s gone into this as we probably heard this over and over again where we re doing great things and trying to figure out how to pay for them often sometimes after the fact. but and i ll say this. in this situation i think one thing echoed and i m sure my colleagues all agree, this is not something we want to undermine any of the incredible hard work that s gone into creating a spectacular new facility in our new cruise ship terminal. essential my sense has been that was never anything intended and it s actually not naming rights nor is it a place taking. but i think we concur with those concerns, but i don t think that that is something that we have contemplated or anyone has contemplated, but this is really an opportunity to acknowledge the work that people have done to make so much happen in our city, to thank people that have made things hap
i m the administrative engineer there. i was the one who opened the bids and one of the things that i do is a bid summary which summarizes all the bids. so, the low contractor i did contact and asked them how sure are you about this bid. and they affirmed that they would want to continue with this and that s the price that they will honor. so, we re willing to obligate the bid price that they put down. you know, we ve had some problems with people not being able to perform the work that they signed for and we end up in lawsuits. i m a little worried about it personally. [speaker not understood]. we have a couple options. the city s bidding process is we accept a low bid unless there is a reason to reject the low bid. we could reject the bids and rebid it. or you could i don t know, thinking on the fly here. go ahead. certainly we wouldn t we can t increase the contract without coming back to the commission. the two bids the other two bids are pretty even, then
that s gone into this as we probably heard this over and over again where we re doing great things and trying to figure out how to pay for them often sometimes after the fact. but and i ll say this. in this situation i think one thing echoed and i m sure my colleagues all agree, this is not something we want to undermine any of the incredible hard work that s gone into creating a spectacular new facility in our new cruise ship terminal. essential my sense has been that was never anything intended and it s actually not naming rights nor is it a place taking. but i think we concur with those concerns, but i don t think that that is something that we have contemplated or anyone has contemplated, but this is really an opportunity to acknowledge the work that people have done to make so much happen in our city, to thank people that have made things happen and to really acknowledge what allows us to move forward with creative and beautiful projects along the waterfront. so, again
among san francisco, a jewel among the world class cities. thank you. thank you. is there any other public comment? commissioners? any questions, comments? i want to thank the staff and appreciate the effort that s gone into this as we probably heard this over and over again where we re doing great things and trying to figure out how to pay for them often sometimes after the fact. but and i ll say this. in this situation i think one thing echoed and i m sure my colleagues all agree, this is not something we want to undermine any of the incredible hard work that s gone into creating a spectacular new facility in our new cruise ship terminal. essential my sense has been that was never anything intended and it s actually not naming rights nor is it a place taking. but i think we concur with those concerns, but i don t think that that is something that we have contemplated or anyone has contemplated, but this is really an opportunity to acknowledge the work that people have