want him to show up because he has to testify under oath, but i don t think he ll show up. i don t think he s man enough. we ll see. okay. i guess she said that. nancy pelosi challenges the former president, doubting he will give any testimony to the january 6th committee. i don t know if you heard, but at one point, she didn t think he was man enough to show up. we ll go through the time line in that investigation in just a moment. meanwhile, alarming details about what the fbi found at trump s country club, documents so sensitive they could endanger the lives of people who are helping u.s. intelligence. also healed, boris johnson. he wants to come back, right. he s a no go. like tom brady s comeback. he s a no go. this is going to end really well for everybody involved. he s no longer in the running to become the british prime minister. what? but a new leader could be named as soon as today. we ll go live to london for that. plus, joe, the part of
on crime in many races across the country. i m not sure there s a reason for that. often times, like we re seeing here in new york, the republican candidate for governor is an example. lee zeldin who has been running ads around crime that certainly speak to the concerns that voters have as all candidates should. but yet don t actually offer any substantiative solutions for public safety. there s no reason that democrats should allow the republicans to do that. the question is can democrats pivot quickly enough, kind of realizing that that s going to be the top concern for many voters in the next coming weeks or are they going to kind of have trouble transitioning away from what they thought was going to be the more important issues on voters minds which was abortion, for example. it is striking, though, that in many polls, we are seeing that for democrats, the top issue is
as long as senator graham chooses tosupport legislation that sides with people in this country illegally and unlawfully instead of our own american citizen where citizens, we re going nowhere. he s been an out lilier for yea. so your take on that? well, look, this tends to happen when tensions get high and both sides are dug in. i think there s a couple of things here, ana. one, the president has had trouble transitioning from business to entertainment to politics when it comes to negotiating. he has for years been a bit of a cipher and a shifter when it comes to deals. changing parameters in the middle of the game. and that may work outside of politics. but in politics to be successful
his initial reaction, 48 hours later. when we saw his initial reaction, and seems to me inadequate in terms of how we define what we want out of presidential leadership. was it inappropriate he began a statement today with comments about unemployment, jobs, the economy. well, that s donald trump, wolf. we ve seen this from him before, we re seeing it from him today. certainly that s the conversation that donald trump in this situation would prefer to be having. he doesn t want to be talking about racial issues. as we saw during the campaign, if he is talking about race, ethnicity, it is to use those issues as some wedge. donald trump, for him, we ve seen on multiple occasions during his presidency, he had trouble transitioning from candidate mode to president mode. there are times in the presidency when you do have to be this figure of moral authority, when you need to inspire the nation, show some moral leadership, and we didn t really see that from him over
without doing something to take care of those people, they will be millions of people who lose their health care plan. that is a democrats job to take over your health care. the senators from those dates, many of the states, will say, they will say, unless there is a plan to take care of these people, then, we won t vote for it. the other side, you have the conservatives who ideologically want to repeal this mandate and the problem is, they want to go back in a time machine to before obamacare existed and just say, let s get rid of it and start over. we can pretend it didn t exist. millions of people got coverage. we have to find a way to cover them any better way that is more cost-effective, driven by the market. and we ll cover those people. any plan that has millions of people losing their health care is both morally wrong and politically a loser. shannon: tonight, matt, leaders are saying that is not a case. there s a special fund for those who have trouble transitioning. no one