because it carries about the same sentence as if they had run the table. because in fraud cases like this, the sentence is driven by the amount of the loss. the patient count had not very much loss at all. we re talking about hundreds of millions of dollars. mur dock 100 million alone. when you apply that in the guidelines, you are looking automatically at a sentence a real sentence unless the judge decides to depart downwards significantly. in about the 15, 16, 17 year range. more over the sentencing judge can even take a account of the conduct the jury didn t find her guilty of or acquitted her of. it sounds a little like a mixed bag. it isn t. it s a thumping. and the government triumphant today and the camp is