Page 2 - Trial Up News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Trial up. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Trial Up Today - Breaking & Trending Today
attacking president biden, the justice department, or even judge chutkan herself. one of those potential witnesses is trump s former attorney, william barr, who trump slammed on social media last night a little more than an hour after the judge had filed her decision. at a 21 pm last night, trump posted, quote, i call bill barr dumb, weak, slow-moving, lethargic, got loose and lazy, a rhino who couldn t do the job. that s an all caps, if you re listening. bill barr is a loser, all caps. judge chutkan and special counsel s team have not yet responded to the social media attack on bill barr. the remarks are part of a pattern for the former president. while the gag order was on pause last week, trump lashed out at another potential key witness in the case. mark meadows. on tuesday last, week trump weighed in on a report from abc news that meadows, trump s former white house chief of staff had testified in the case under an immunity deal. and a social media post, trump insi ....
Very tough place in, terms of if she held him in contempt, as she would in the other defendant, if she tries to hold him in custody and revoke his bail, because of his behavior, it is going to look bad politically. she knows it. if she moved the trial up, that is a brilliant way of keeping him under control. having his lawyers try to prevent him from continuing to threaten people. so, i thought she did a really clever and wonderful thing in making that statement. i hope that it will stop him from what he has been doing. i am doubting that it will. i don t think you re alone in that doubt. julián, the obvious question, the first that comes to mind, whether or not these reminders, these guardrails change any of trump s rhetoric. the bigger question is about the stakes here, right? if he is not able to follow that protective order, it means not just for donald trump, and not just for this case, for the testing of our democracy and our legal system. ....
Very tough place in terms of if she held him in contempt, as she would in the other defendant, if she tries to hold him in custody and revoke his bail, because of his behavior, it is going to look bad politically. she knows it. if she moved the trial up, that is a brilliant way of keeping him under control. having his lawyers try to prevent him from continuing to threaten people. so, i thought she did a really clever and wonderful thing in making that statement. i hope that it will stop him from what he has been doing. i am doubting that it will. i don t think you re alone in that doubt. julián, the obvious question, the first that comes to mind, whether or not these reminders, these guardrails change any of trump s rhetoric. the bigger question is about the stakes here, right? if he is not able to follow that protective order, it means not just for donald trump, and not just for this case, for the testing of our democracy and our legal system. ....
There is a protective order. what is unusual here, number one, the warning that was given to donald trump and his lawyers about threatening witnesses. the prosecutor and possibly even the judge. that is unusual. i think the other thing that stands out is that she was brilliant. judge chutkan, i think did the most brilliant thing process. which is to say, we ve heard your statements, if you continue to make these outrageous statements, i am going to move the trial date up every single time you do it. and that s because she was in a very tough place in, terms of if she held him in contempt, as she would in the other defendant, if she tries to hold him in custody and revoke his bail, because of his behavior, it is going to look bad politically. she knows it. if she moved the trial up, that is a brilliant way of keeping him under control. ....
Things and say this is just wrong, just wrong. my hope is as they set this trial up, they ll find ways to insist that the cover up on data and also witnesses, that that cover up cannot continue. you have to have testimony that describes exactly what this administration did. if i may make one other comment, the chief justice of the supreme court plays a very limited role here. there s not much of a role for the chief justice of the supreme court. he s there, and he reads the questions that senators send to the house managers or the president s counsel. but the fact is the party that controls their caucus in the senate in this case, it s mitch mcconnell will have significant sway if he can keep all his people. as you know, mitch is a pretty ruthless guy. look what he did to merrick garland. so he s going to try everything he can to prevent erosions from his caucus. here s a question. nothing is a foregone conclusion ....