Live Breaking News & Updates on Transportation Funds
Stay updated with breaking news from Transportation funds. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
guest: of course it doesn t. you look at the president s priorities and that is the et cetera ensure of the problem, instead of going to the government s responsibility we making sure the roads and bridges are safe he is proposing $3 billion for the fast rail with no cost analysis benefit. this is the philosophy rather than focusing on the true, real, good purpose of government, and our responsibility to provide for just this thing, we are off helping build more bicycle trails with federal funds when we have seen unsustainable increases in transportation spending right new. we just have seen $4 trillion mark that the president has increased the debt by and, yet, we are talking about adding to that? how about focusing our transportation funds on what is necessary and cutting owe the ....
Would do, ray lahood should figure out which district needs to get those transportation funds. that new senior citizen center or that road that s that really needs to be resurfaced. and you can improve things on the margins that way. do you think that s the sort of thing that needs to be done with republicans in secret? that s the sort of thing you can lure republicans in voting for things, or at least going along with things by offering them things that will make big difference in jobs and infrastructure in their district. is the political climate such that they can t own up to the fact that those thins would be a material good? well, eventually they have to own up to a simple arithmetic and basic logic. so you do have to put it out there, and have you to get them to the point where they recognize objective reality, we are number 23 and falling by the ....
Infrastructure investment? not job creation per say. it would have to be like a happy byproduct. government cannot and never does create jobs. therefore, you can t have infrastructure projects can t create jobs. however, there is an iron clad rule in washington which says that as you noted, the rickety bridge that needs to be replaced in my district is vital infrastructure, if it s in somebody else s district it s out of control spending. now, one thing the administration can do, and in a more machiavellian administration would do, ray lahood should figure out which district needs to get those transportation funds. that new senior citizen center or that road that s that really needs to be resurfaced. and you can improve things on ....
how are you doing, rachel? i m good. i don t know how optimistic i am in the short term, maybe in the longer term. do you see any light at all here? do you think there could be any agreement about pursuing job creation by pursuing infrastructure investment? not job creation per say. it would have to be like a happy byproduct. government cannot and never does create jobs. tlfr, you can t have infrastructure projects can t create jobs. however, there is an iron clad rule in washington which says that as you noted, the rickety bridge that needs to be replaced in my district is vital infrastructure, if it s in somebody else s district it s out of control spending. now, one thing the administration can do, and in a more maciavellian administration would do, ray lahood should figure out which district needs to get those transportation ....