I visited the department of publicSan Francisco General Hospital recollect their Emergency Department and other departments aant to the maurjs department and saw sth staffic levels and it was remarkable to see the amoubt of tension not just because it was the Trauma Center but because there is a lot of overlap in nursing possessions and there were not enough nurses to happen the work load. I went back again this year and learned that we really haventthere is still some of the same conditions that exist there. Last year i had done a hearing looking at how the city was moving forward on increasing staffing to meet the demand. There was actually it took about a year for someone to put their name into the system to actually get hired and in the mean time a lot of people applied for jobs and decidesed to move on to other place tooz practice nursing. I think that is a loss for the sate that we are not being able to maximize the level of staffing we could have and the Skilled Nursing we could
And know thiz doesnt ocome from you and comes from the Housing Action coalition. I disagree with that finding. I would hope to not be forced to vote against my own legislation because i dont agree with the set of findings that came from the group. Hack and i disagree ochb what it take tooz build Affordable Housing and their pain is we build as much as possible and supply will become affordable. I dont know if that is true. The problem is we are not building enough Affordable Housing. We met 200 percent of the need of luxiary housing. I konet have the numbers before me, but if we were supposed to build a thousand luxiary units we built 2 thousand. That is what free market supply does. It doesnt build more Affordable Housing, it helps build more luxiary housing in a city where that demand exists. I cant support this finding and think it is controversial and has balt mexers memberoffs the board are on both sides of. I want to clarify i dont think this comes from you, i go you bring this o
Approved project from starting construction and the use of Citizen Initiative tooz delay or halt new housing. Supervisor co00 cohen is that the only amendment to proprose this language . I would like to respond to that. I did read that language and know thiz doesnt ocome from you and comes from the Housing Action coalition. I disagree with that finding. I would hope to not be forced to vote against my own legislation because i dont agree with the set of findings that came from the group. Hack and i disagree ochb what it take tooz build Affordable Housing and their pain is we build as much as possible and supply will become affordable. I dont know if that is true. The problem is we are not building enough Affordable Housing. We met 200 percent of the need of luxiary housing. I konet have the numbers before me, but if we were supposed to build a thousand luxiary units we built 2 thousand. That is what free market supply does. It doesnt build more Affordable Housing, it helps build more l
The group. Hack and i disagree ochb what it take tooz build Affordable Housing and their pain is we build as much as possible and supply will become affordable. I dont know if that is true. The problem is we are not building enough Affordable Housing. We met 200 percent of the need of luxiary housing. I konet have the numbers before me, but if we were supposed to build a thousand luxiary units we built 2 thousand. That is what free market supply does. It doesnt build more Affordable Housing, it helps build more luxiary housing in a city where that demand exists. I cant support this finding and think it is controversial and has balt mexers memberoffs the board are on both sides of. I want to clarify i dont think this comes from you, i go you bring this on behalf of hack, i just cant support this finding and the legislation sfr visor cohen you have falloy up . I was looking to have a good conver saigdssation and better understander of supervisor kims position as to what part of the langu