illustrative of how they are trying to squeeze a menagerie of spending into their negotiated 1.75 trillion topline costs, with the real cost likely to be closer to what you think. what do you think? it is spot on, the gimmick is to take one of the social welfare and/or entitlement programs and put it in for a year or maybe three years or at most five years whereas most of the scoring for these things are done over a 10-year periods so what they are saying is we are going to sneak it in so we have lower spending for that year, but really wink-wink nod nod, we will make it permanent. so we are lying to you. and i think that cbo will be hard-pressed to deal with this. this is not the first time it has ever been done in history of revenue are spending scoring, but they may produce two