This week, and in fact, we will find out who will be the guest of the studio this sunday. Undoubtedly, the topics will be relevant, the guests will be special. Proper names with myroslava barchuk. Sunday, 17 10 at espresso. We continue our war and weapons program. It is aimed at reviewing the Technological Solutions used by our military battlefield in the first part, we talked about how the military themselves see such models, why they need them, and now we will talk with. Companies, representatives of companies, with industrialists who create such models, because actually now, if we are there we read the message of the minister of technology, there are no numbers, then formally everything is fine with us, the number of drones is increasing, Profit Margins are increasing, the potential of the company is expanding, but in any case, all the same, the manufacturers have a number of basic questions for our customers, there are a number proposals and now we are joined by kateryna mikhalko,
Work directly with the manufacturer, as you asked how it works, i will tell you how it works, it works so that the manufacturer of the saber turret and the lynx platform and i just shook hands and said guys, in you have something we can fight with, give it to us, please, and well just announce that we we must, we are ready for this. Well, it is a certain risk, because when you take some new technology to war, you still take a risk, well, because it may not work, and well, it will be a risk for you personally , and accordingly we are taking a certain risk, but please be a weasel and go to meet us, that is, give us what we should risk, and they are very clear, i will tell you that some of the sabers that we received , we received from the manufacturers, summing up with that being said, the vast majority of manufacturers are interested in giving these products to us directly for testing, even if they money is badly needed, well, because you understand that, its not so much about earnings,
Set to our manufacturer and supplier of foreignmade products . Uh, import suppliers are not subject to, for example, product cost limits, so they just submit their price list offer, and if ukraine needs these weapons, we buy them. For ukrainian manufacturers, this price regulation is very rigid and uncomfortable, and this quantity will arrive there. That Companies Receive is not enough to make reinvestments in the latest technology, so it is the main pain there that the imported suppliers have much more resources to invest in the latest developments and these resources later. Another aspect on which it is more difficult for us as the state to influence is the fact that ukrainian producers, they are under fire and they are very often a target for the russians, and that is. Imposes certain security risks, of course, on the teams that manufacture weapons, and it would be nice if the state helped, for example, with underground facilities and somehow made additional subsidies in order for t
Have a separate one, its Unmanned Systems, and its fantastic, in other words, eh, its, you know, a very cossack story, when you, as a free person, can come up with things while in the army, its very regulated structure, a very hierarchical structure, but when you show some initiative in the ukrainian army, at least no one interferes with you, summarizing the answer to this question, it is not from general staff it should go from top to bottom, do it like this , this is the general staff hearing how they work in the fields and , well, just ready to help in this, so i am very hopeful with optimism, i look at this whole story around ground robotic complexes, around Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , because we have a good interaction between a soldier and a man with big epaulettes, that is. Well, of course we have bureaucratic difficulties, i dont think you are interested in hearing about them, but the most important thing is that this distance from directly to the operator of the groundbased gro
And i am proud of you. I know you are currently residing in florida but you are a true puerto rican. I know you are fighting for equality, and that is the solution. The democratic thing to do the right thing to do economically and financially for puerto rico insofar as the immediate crisis is concerned. Congress could give puerto rico a tool that is not available in puerto rico, and that is chapter nine of the bankruptcy code. It allows companies to reorganize themselves under the protection of the bankruptcy court, so that they can meet their payment obligations. It allows them to restructure in an organized and legal way. That is why i am fighting for that in congress. But the permanent solution would be to allow puerto rico to join the union. Pay federal taxes. But at the same time, get the same benefits from the federal government. Then puerto rico would prosper with that kind of profit status. There would be a transition, but we would have no Political Risk and we would drive the