Stay updated with breaking news from Tom oliver. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
fairest way to judge him, and that he said it s the way he wanted to be judged. he sold himself as being a businessman who would run the government more efficiently, and he would do better negotiation. he said he would he was better. he said he could run things very efficiently. i thought it was a nice conceit to sit and look and say, he was the ceo, and if you were the board examining how he had run this company of america, how well had he done? carol: let s go down that path. just in talking to russian officials and giving up intelligence guest: allegedly. carol: allegedly. guest: if you were the board and this was your ceo, you would immediately call the whole thing with comey, which obviously we have defined it what the facts are, and the precedent. but on the front become a, you would immediately say, what were you doing? were you trying to silence a whistleblower? and that is a very egregious thing. in terms of inviting the russians comment and it would appear ....
joan: john: i think it s probably the fairest way to judge him, and that he said it s the way he wanted to be judged. he sold himself as being a businessman who would run the government more efficiently, and he would do better negotiation. he rubbished barack obama, hillary clinton and said he was better than this. he said he could run things very efficiently. i thought it was a nice conceit to sit and look and say, he was the ceo, and if you were the board examining how he had run this company of america, how well had he done? carol: let s go down that path. let s just take, talking to russian officials and giving up intelligence information, that is akin to allegedly. carol: allegedly. john: if you were the board and this was your ceo, you would immediately call the whole thing with comey, which obviously we have to find out what the facts are and then proceed, but at least on the front of it, you would immediately say, what were you doing? were you trying to si ....
john micklethwait. john, in your opening remarks section of this week s is this week you essentially hold up donald trump his own meter stick, by his own standards for what he promised. tell us about how you went about taking about this. john: i think it s probably the fairest way to judge him, and that he said it s the way he wanted to be judged. he sold himself as being a businessman who would run the government more efficiently, and he would do better negotiation. he rubbished barack obama, hillary clinton and said he was better than this. he said he could run things very efficiently. i thought it was a nice conceit to sit and look and say, he was the ceo, and if you were the board examining how he had run this company of america, how well had he done? carol: let s go down that path. let s just take, talking to russian officials and giving up intelligence information, that is akin to john: allegedly. carol: allegedly. john: if you were the board and this was your ....
john micklethwait. john, in your opening remarks section of this week s is this week you essentially hold up donald trump his own meter stick, by his own standards for what he promised. tell us about how you went about taking about this. john: i think it s probably the fairest way to judge him, and that he said it s the way he wanted to be judged. he sold himself as being a businessman who would run the government more efficiently, and he would do better negotiation. he rubbished barack obama, hillary clinton, generations of u.s. trade negotiatoris, and said he was better than this. he said he could run things very efficiently. i thought it was a nice conceit to sit and look and say, he was the ceo, and if you were the board examining how he had run this company of america, how well had he done? carol: let s go down that path. let s just take, talking to russian officials and giving up intelligence information, that is akin to john: allegedly. carol: allegedly. no, ....
fairest way to judge him, and that he said it s the way he wanted to be judged. he sold himself as being a businessman who would run the government more efficiently, and he would do better negotiation. he rubbished barack obama, hillary clinton, generations of u.s. trade negotiatoris, and said he was better than this. he said he could run things very efficiently. i thought it was a nice conceit to sit and look and say, he was the ceo, and if you were the board examining how he had run this company of america, how well had he done? carol: let s go down that path. let s just take, talking to russian officials and giving up intelligence information, that is akin to john: allegedly. carol: allegedly. no, let s be fair. john: if you were the board and this was your ceo, you would immediately call the whole thing with comey, which obviously we have to find out what the facts are and then proceed, but at least on the front of it, you would immediately say, what were you doin ....