Stay updated with breaking news from Todd humes. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
IN THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, COUNTY OF STUTSMAN IN THE DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHEAST JUDICIAL DISTRICT U.S. Bank Trust National Association, not in its individual capacity but solely as owner trustee for RCF 2 Acquisition Trust c/o U.S. Bank Trust National Association, Plaintiff, v. Todd Humes and Denise Humes and Allen Chase and Askegaard Bros. Lawn Irrigation and Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. and Instant Printing & Business Forms, Inc. d/b/a Two Rivers Printing and Joseph F. Larson II Law Firm PC and North Dakota Office of State Tax Commissioner and Northern Excavating Co., Inc. and Spark’s Sale’s LLC and State of North Dakota by Job Service North Dakota and United States of America acting by and through the Internal Revenue Service and Vining Oil & Gas, LLC, and any person in possession, Defendants. NOTICE OF REAL ESTATE SALE CIVIL NUMBER: 47-2022-CV-00017 1. Judgment in the amount of $189,799.01, having been entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants, which Judgme ....
IN THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, COUNTY OF STUTSMAN IN THE DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHEAST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REAL ESTATE SALE CIVIL NUMBER: 47-2022-CV-00017 U.S. Bank Trust National Association, not in its individual capacity but solely as owner trustee for RCF 2 Acquisition Trust c/o U.S. Bank Trust National Association, Plaintiff, v. Todd Humes and Denise Humes and Allen Chase and Askegaard Bros. Lawn Irrigation and Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. and Instant Printing & Business Forms, Inc. d/b/a Two Rivers Printing and Joseph F. Larson II Law Firm PC and North Dakota Office of State Tax Commissioner and Northern Excavating Co., Inc. and Spark’s Sale’s LLC and State of North Dakota by Job Service North Dakota and United States of America acting by and through the Internal Revenue Service and Vining Oil & Gas, LLC, and any person in possession, Defendants. Judgment in the amount of $189,799.01, having been entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants, which Judgment ....