Stay updated with breaking news from To texas. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
tourists, canada considers the same for any tourists. canada already indicating come monday all public establishments must cut themselves town to 50% down to 50% capacity. all restaurants, bars, theaters must honor this. what to make of all of this. welcome, everybody. i m neil cavuto, and a very, very world worried world at that trying to deal with spikes in omicron in particular that has now gotten one country after another reassessing the need for restrictions. some are just way over the top, others are making people question whether they should get together at all for the holidays. is all of that fair, right or even necessary? we re on top of it all, and you decide what you want to do in response to it all. let s first go to mark meredith in wilmington, delaware, with the president. reporter: neil, good morning to you. both the president and senior white house health officials are issuing stark and dire warnings to unvaccinated americans, letting them know abo ....
it s way too early for this. i m jonathan lemire on this tuesday, september 28th weechlt start with the news. house speaker nancy pelosi has changed course, telling democrats they will vote on the bipartisan infrastructure bill before reconciliation is done. in a democratic caucus meeting last night, pelosi announced the change in plans. she originally announced she would link two bills together, refusing to vote on the senate-passed infrastructure bill until the other bill was ready as well. according to an aide, speaker pelosi blamed it on the senate. she said, quote, i told all of you we wouldn t go on to the bipartisan infrastructure we had the reconciliation bill passed by the senate. we were right on schedule to do all of that until ten days ago, a week ago, when i heard the news that this number had to come down. they re reportedly hoping the president will publicly pressure members of congress to vote for the infrastructure bill. speaker pelosi is acknowledgin ....
good day, i m chris jansing, along with my colleague, katy tur. what a day it has been with tremendous legal and political consequences, two hearings, both with huge consequences, in fact, for donald trump and the november election. one of them s pretty cut and try. the basic question was when can we get this thing started? in new york, the judge was straightforward, no more delays. the former president s hush money trial set to go forward a mere 40 days from now. chris, the other one, which is happening as we speak in fulton county is not so cut and dry, very much the opposite. it s getting messy, playing out you could say like a tv drama or even a soap opera. the hearing will start again any moment now, and it s already been pretty contentious, some would say borderline salacious. we are waiting for dramatic testimony to continue from special prosecutor nathan wade. he was forced to testify about his relationship with d.a. fani willis. before this break, wade was ....
any moment now an hearing is expected to resume in fulton county, georgia, hello, john roberts in washington. this is a very interesting day. welcome back, sandra. sandra: it has been a very interesting day. good to be with you, john. sandra smith in new york and this is america reports . explosive testimony detailing the timeline of fani willis relationship with special prosecutor nathan wade. willis former friend testified that she had no doubt the two of them were in a romantic relationship dating back to 2019, long before wade was hired in the case. john: that testimony directly contradicted wade s statements when he took the stand a short time ago. we have an a-team of legal experts. jonathan turley, leo terrell and kerri urbahn. start with you, seems nathan wade is doing everything he possibly can to try to avoid saying that he and fani willis were an item before he was hired as the special prosecutor. i thought the testimony from the witness this morni ....
why he decided to file why do you have the right to object on his behalf for attorney/client privilege. i don t make formal there we go. and i believe he s already attempted to answer this question, and it was no privilege raised. so he s given a partial answer and now he s about to finish that, so first of all, i don t think it s covered by attorney/client privilege, i ll deal with that if you want me to, but otherwise he s already answered it. it was a long preface, i don t think it ever got to what might have been at issue there, so if you can lay the foundation, we ll deal with the objection. ok. take a step back. you realize an attorney/client privilege is the privilege of the client, correct? yes, sir. and you, in connection with your representation, at least as been proffered to the court by mr. bradley, that it s up to you to decide whether you want to raise the privilege, right? yes, sir. it s not up to mr. bradley. yes, sir. so ....