traditional analysis of an injunction this is not final relief in th case this is not the dispositiv ruling on the party s rights it is meant to set the state o play during an appeal. and so, injunctions usuall keep the status quo in order so that no one s rights ar changed while the litigation i spending and then, the courts can make final decision so, the texas ruling is really an abhorrent one this notion that he can change the rules for everyone nationwide, is ver untraditional in the law o injunctions. if this goes to the supreme court, your sense of where the six conservative justices migh land you know, it is alway dangerous to crystal ball. you and i have had tha conversation a lot, in a abortion, it is perhaps less s than in other areas. this is a court that seems t have a separate jurisprudenc when it comes to abortions they seem to be very engaged i limiting access to abortion.
ruling on the party s rights it is meant to set the state o play during an appeal. and so, injunctions usuall keep the status quo in order so that no one s rights ar changed while the litigation i spending and then, the courts can make final decision so, the texas ruling is really an abhorrent one this notion that he can change the rules for everyone nationwide, is ver untraditional in the law o injunctions. if this goes to the supreme court, your sense of where the six conservative justices migh land you know, it is alway dangerous to crystal ball. you and i have had tha conversation a lot, in a abortion, it is perhaps less s than in other areas. this is a court that seems t have a separate jurisprudenc when it comes to abortions they seem to be very engaged i limiting access to abortion. this case is perhaps a littl bit unusual because it doe involve fda approval of a drug and whether that should be withdrawn.
each state is entitled t decide for itself. so, he entered an order making mifepristone available only in the 17 states that wer involved in the lawsuit in front of him you know, this is th traditional analysis of an injunction this is not final relief in th case this is not the dispositiv ruling on the party s rights it is meant to set the state o play during an appeal. and so, injunctions usuall keep the status quo in order so that no one s rights ar changed while the litigation i spending and then, the courts can make final decision so, the texas ruling is really an abhorrent one this notion that he can change the rules for everyone nationwide, is ver untraditional in the law o injunctions. if this goes to the supreme court, your sense of where the six conservative justices migh land you know, it is alway dangerous to crystal ball. you and i have had tha conversation a lot, in a abortion, it is perhaps less s
of the funding that we increase last year to enforce the provisions of the internal revenue code. we know that there has been a declined by 75% of audits for those at the top, and that s what they propose to eliminate. i want to ask about your party s leadership, you have a new party leader, congressman not party, libra vote party leader within congress, congressman hakeem jeffries. i want to play a little bit of his first speech as minority leader. o play a we are white, we are, we are latino, we are a nation, we are native american. we are christian, we are jewish, we are muslim, we are hindu, we are religious, we are secular, we are gay, we are straight, we are young, we are older, we are women, we are man, we are citizens, we are dreamers, we are out of many, we are one, that s what makes america great country. and no matter what s young [applause] kind of haters are trying to