at the scene of the accident. i feel the opinion rendered by the existent medical examiner at that time is not sufficient. is a vital factor of the ca case. they were conflicted about disturbing their daughters final resting place. , have a choice, to exhume mary jo s body in order to satisfy some morbid curiosity that people may or may not have had. these were diehard catholic people and they didn t believe in exhuming someone just to prove something. they hired a lawyer and on september 24, filed their own paperwork, begging the court not to allow the daughters body to be disturbed. so that s the last thing they could have under their control was the ability to not exhume
at the scene of the accident. i feel the opinion rendered by the existent medical examiner at that time is not sufficient. is a vital factor of the ca case. they were conflicted about disturbing their daughters final resting place. , have a choice, to exhume mary jo s body in order to satisfy some morbid curiosity that people may or may not have had. these were diehard catholic people and they didn t believe in exhuming someone just to prove something. they hired a lawyer and on september 24, filed their own paperwork, begging the court not to allow the daughters body to be disturbed. so that s the last thing they could have under their control was the ability to not exhume