Think of the Fire Department. What if a Fire Department responding to a fire alarm gets into a car accident and somebody gets hurt. There is always potential danger. Thats why its against the law. The sfpd says shes on the job while they conduct an administrative duty. The case appears to show a serious lapse in judgment. If they are not exercising good judgment in personal life or on good duty, that puts you on notice to look and see is this the right person for the job . Reporter i pulled the dispatch recordings from the day. Engine 72 fire alarm manuel pull. Reporter it was a busy everything. Serious medical calls came in. A 57yearold male with a stroke symptom. Reporter and a 45yearold heart patient with chest pains, a 97yearold woman having difficulty breathing. The Fire Department also had to respond to this false alarm. 72, we made contact with the pacifica pd. If you can pull an Emergency Vehicle out of one area and away from the next emergency that comes in and thats dangerous
Vehicle. Reporter police say the suspect ran a red light three miles away on lawrence expressway and slammed into a rideshare car. In that car was 28yearold carol major and the male passenger. Carol died at a local hospital. The other passenger and the Rideshare Driver have serious injuries. Youve got one person, young person who has lost their life and two other people whose lives will never be the same, innocent people, who did absolutely nothing wrong, and this person who has just no care in the world for them. Reporter Police Arrested 32yearold Claudio Perez of san jose. Before the crash Sunnyvale Police put spike strips under a stolen car at this Shopping Mall and watched it until perez got inside and drove off. The strips didnt work for some reason. Then the crash. Oh, its a terrible tragedy. Reporter her Facebook Page shows carol major was from san diego, attended cal and was a Technical Program manager at apple. Tonight neighbors in san diego tell us carols griefstricken family
Its thanks to a new law that requires car dealers to issue temporary license plates before a car hits the road with numbers that can be tracked. Good evening, im julie haener. And im frank somerville. The bay area total authority says new data shows the state law is working as it was intended with a dramatic drop in the number of cars passing through the toll gates without paying. It was a ktvu investigation that drew attention to the problem six years ago. Prompting peninsula assemblymen kevin mullen to craft a new law. Ktvus Jana Katsuyama was the reporter then and shes at the bay bridge toll plaza tonight with a closer look at the positive impact of the new law. Reporter frank and julie, when we first reported on this, california told authorities and Law Enforcement officers had no way of catching these drivers. Thats because these generic dealer placards were so common. Now this initial data shows more drivers are paying their fair share. At toll crossings more money is rolling in
1st, 2019. So a grandfathered mcd, as defined in section 190 of the planning code, that receives a permit to operate as an mcd before january 1st, 2019, so in the 2018 window shall be deemed a temporary cannabis sales use, and upon expiration of the temporary cannabis sales use authorization, the land use authorization for the parcel will revert to the original authorization to operate as an mcd unless the establishment has received a permit authorization to operate az a Retail Cannabis use. This would also need to result in an amendment to 205. 2 in the planning code. It would just add a subsection to that sub of the code stating that a temporary permit for cannabis use would last for one year and would expire on january 1st, 2019. The amendment would also provide for a process for these grandfathered mcds to obtain a Permanent Land use authorization to become Cannabis Retail uses, and that would be to section 190 of the planning code, subsection c, which would state in order for a gr
Can you tell us what section youre referring to. Supervisor kim so this is the section 1609, the section that supervisor safai had just asked a question about, so under 1609, this is b21c, it says describe how the applicant will work to encourage applicants who have received cannabis permits, and otherwise further the citys equity goals, which i also agree with. Am i misreading the first part . It seems to me that all applicants will have to talk about how theyre going to encourage and support equity applicants who have been awarded business permits. It should read equity applicants, not permit operators. Supervisor kim so to take out who have been awarded cannabis business permits . Supervisors, one opportunity to address that concern, maybe to say, instead of who have been awarded, to instead say, who are seeking . Jap ja supervisor kim i think the goal is who help those get into the business, but i wouldnt want to force people to help their competitors. Okay. So excuse me . Is that