Louisiana trials. But we need to place this into perspective. This laudable ruling would only apply to cases then pending or recent will i adjudicated. It meant nothing to mr mr. Edwards, the only place that would jail you for life on a nonunanimous verdict. Why should the 6th amendment mean something less to mr. Edwards. Members of the ramos court were divided how to reconcile the fractured decision with then existing precedent. This cleared two paths that ramos, two paths to remedy those jailed by a jury scheme we know was morally wrong at its i think so tension and is unconstitutional. For some, apdoca was dead on arrival. And with these, they provided no value and ramos is an old rule dictated by precedent that simply restored the 6th amendments full measure either through the due process clause or privileges or immunities clause of the 14th amendment. For other justices. Apadoca was such a wrong decision, it needed to be overruled. And this restores fairness to jury trials in loui
Louisianas nonunanimous jury. On paper with a full breath of the jury trial right but the ruling needs to be put into perspective this ruling the ending or adjudicated it meant nothing to serving a life sentence for work that would be illegal everywhere else but louisianas only place that would you for life on a nonunanimous verdict. The question before the court is why should the fifth amendment mean something less us members of the court were divided on how to reconcile the fracture decision this had clear as to have a remedy for those of the jury scheme that was morally wrong at its inception and unconstitutional. They havent no president ial value this is an old rule and an accident for the six amendment full measure with the due process clause or the privileges or immunities clause of the 14th amendment. With such a long a decision to be explicitly for those members of the court should be a watershed and restores for fairness and accuracy to the jury trials in louisiana. And those
Louisianas nonunanimous jury. On paper with a full breath of the jury trial right but the ruling needs to be put into perspective this ruling the ending or adjudicated it meant nothing to serving a life sentence for work that would be illegal everywhere else but louisianas only place that would you for life on a nonunanimous verdict. The question before the court is why should the fifth amendment mean something less us members of the court were divided on how to reconcile the fracture decision this had clear as to have a remedy for those of the jury scheme that was morally wrong at its inception and unconstitutional. They havent no president ial value this is an old rule and an accident for the six amendment full measure with the due process clause or the privileges or immunities clause of the 14th amendment. With such a long a decision to be explicitly for those members of the court should be a watershed and restores for fairness and accuracy to the jury trials in louisiana. And those
You get to hear about Upcoming Supreme Court term and hear from some of the top experts we could line up. The order in which our three panelists will speak varies slightly from the program you might have seen and it is reverse alphabetical order. Will introduce the three of them all at once and take a seat. You might even hear from eat later on. From me later on. Elia will always be the one who got away. He is now the director of constitutional studies and a senior fellow. However, probably all of you know him for many years to be spent at Cato Institute culminating in being director of catos center for constitutional studies. He was publisher and published 11 volumes. He has testified oh ok. You are responsible one way or another for 11 volumes. How many briefs have any of you filed . I bet it has not been more than 500. That is the extraordinary accomplishment and distinction he has here. He is associated with many other Nonprofit Institutions and is the author of supreme disorder ju
You get to hear about Upcoming Supreme Court term and hear from some of the top experts we could line up. The order in which our three panelists will speak varies slightly from the program you might have seen and it is reverse alphabetical order. Will introduce the three of them all at once and take a seat. You might even hear from eat later on. From me later on. Elia will always be the one who got away. He is now the director of constitutional studies and a senior fellow. However, probably all of you know him for many years to be spent at Cato Institute culminating in being director of catos center for constitutional studies. He was publisher and published 11 volumes. He has testified oh ok. You are responsible one way or another for 11 volumes. How many briefs have any of you filed . I bet it has not been more than 500. That is the extraordinary accomplishment and distinction he has here. He is associated with many other Nonprofit Institutions and is the author of supreme disorder ju