Laura Ingraham shines a spotlight on everyday Americans and examines how their lives are affected by politics at the federal, state and local level. When you were chair of the House Oversight committee on who wrote the talking points, who were interested in the families mightve happened in new york, not to mention the Trump Organization and the trump foundation. We would have investigations in congress. Congress is hapless right now. When you were chair of that committee, you investigated. I think you would be investigating right now. Jason you know what. You know why congress is hapless . This Attorney General does nothing to provide documents that congress has issued subpoenas for. Math, come on in here and give us your perspective. This Attorney General is in name only. He i think hes one of the most feckless, ineffective Attorney Generals this country is ever had. Jason, i understand where youre coming from. I am a big fan of Jeff Sessions but i feel it for the last year and a half
information and incriminating evidence. jason: i mean, it did shock us, right? it was days. they told us they were looking into it and then days later they somehow reviewed 700,000 documents? how many people, do you have any idea how many people working on this case looking at these documents? i was going to mention that peter strzok, the disgraced agent who was in charge of the investigation into the clinton emails, he personally handpicked the 3,000 sample. with two other investigators, went through the mall supposedln all-nighter, ordered pizza, and said nothing new here. case closed once again. jason: i ve got to tell you, as the former chairman of the committee, as a former member of congress, i mean, how can that be anything other than the director of the fbi lying to congress and misleading us? stick and he also swore under o,
asking me if the immigration status is relevant. it is not relevant. what is relevant is the individual and the individual actions which have been discussed. jason: his actions of coming here illegally ultimately led to her being killed by this person. that is the allegation. we will see if it s true, but that s the allegation. tom, you have dedicated is a fallacy of causation. he was here for four years with no problem. jason: we don t know that yet. hold on. i want to bring in tom. tom spent a lifetime in law enforcement protecting us and getting rid of some of the most nefarious criminals out there. tom, what is your take on this? i think my friend alan is way wrong on this and you are right. fact: he was in the country illegally. fact: if he wasn t here, this girl would be alive today. it s just a fact of the case. it s not a philosophy. this girl is dead today because he killed her and he was here illegally. if he hadn t been here, if we had a border wall and real
officials are saying their reports indicate. he used a false name to work for an employer. they thought he was somebody else. we know that as well. these are the facts that are being dug up in that case. jason: martha is exactly right. joining me there were three actions are tom homan, a fox news contributor, and the former acting director of i.c.e. and immigration attorney alan orr. allen, is it a legitimate question or subject for us to discuss if somebody is here legally or illegally? stick to it is if we are dealing with a matter of immigration. but i think what the family has said in this situation and also with the law bears out in the way the cases being handled, the fact that this person is undocumented is not an essential part of his actual criminal activity. therefore jason: alan, don t you believe he was unable to get here, if he had come legally and lawfully, he may not ever come here. the fact that he was here and is