Stay updated with breaking news from They dont take. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
This was the last day before the Trump Presidencys 100th day. And congress put in less than half a day because there is no trump agenda item alive in congress right now. There is no bill moving anywhere in congress now. No legislative vehicle that is a trump agenda item. We have never seen a 99th day like this for a president. Every president s busiest legislative year is the first year. Its when their power of persuasion over the congress is at its highest. And it only goes down after that. What a president accomplishes in his first year is usually most of what the president will accomplish in his first term. This is so clear historically that when bob woodward chose to write a book entitled the agenda, he decided to focus entirely on a president s first year. And he picked a president with a loaded first year agenda, bill
clinton. At this point in bill clintons first year, the congress was working overtime. At the same time, c ....
poppy, it s so great to see you on a day like this. such a great day for history to be made, particularly for somebody with the credentials of judge ketanji brown jackson. the idea of having a former federal public defender, someone who was on the sentencing commission, the combination of a great deal of assets and also judicial experience makes her a phenomenal candidate to be a supreme court justice. the idea here, remember, 99% of the cases in the supreme court, they don t take. they have very selective processes for which ones they want to take. yet their decisions are so consequential across the board for every single person in the united states. so that court needs to reflect the people of the united states including those who are and formerly were defendants in the system as well. people often forget when they talk about a prosecutor saying on behalf of the people of the united states, that even a prosecutor knows that also includes the defendant. she ll be a target in terms o ....
That have been allegations today as well. i think - that have been allegations today as well. i think the i today as well. i think the public today as well. i think the public are today as well. i think the public are really- today as well. i think the i public are really following fort public are really following fort nor public are really following fort nor are public are really following fort nor are journalists. fort nor are journalists either~ fort nor are “ournalists either. . , fort nor are “ournalists either. . either. but he has a track record of either. but he has a track record of not either. but he has a track record of not saying - either. but he has a track record of not saying sorry either. but he has a track- record of not saying sorry and he is the prime minister and was mayor of london, something you were involved in. so you ll know that has been a successful political tactic for him. things with borisjohnson is people things with borisjohnson ....
Even though their commander-in-chief. first speech he claimed the last administration stood on the river banks and watched children die of starvation. is he talking about the men and women defending this nation on the frontline. who is saving lives. they save lice. they don t take lives. and they never watched anybody starve to death. i watched border patrol agents even on the bridge they help deliver babies and brought food to. they. rachel: i know. border patrol is the only humanitarian piece of the border biden administration border policies. his policies are inhumane. the border patrol are the finest people i have ever met. i have worn that uniform. my retired badge on the wall over there these are the finest people highest training in the nation. and i m upset that this president is commander-in-chief and vice president and the secretary. rachel: tom, thank you for joining us, more fox & friends next. ....
Supreme court already has the authority to decide which cases they want to hear. i mean, the overwhelming, and i do mean the overwhelming majority of cases, that people want the supreme court to hear. they don t take. they don t review. particularly, if the case has already been resolved. they don t give two bites out of an apple normally, let alone three. but here, the third time was not the charm. and here s why. listen. they went from this moment in time and saying, listen. the congress can use its sort of power of the purse, as a tax issue. to be able to enforce its individual mandate. then, when it went away in terms of an actual-financial penalty and went down to zero. they still said, you know what? you are going to have to show there s some actual penalty involved. that you are actually harmed by the impact of this individual mandate. and so, what the court did essentially close the door in a particular way by saying if there is no-financial penalty in place, you really are goi ....