Stay updated with breaking news from They claimhe th. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Disregard house rules. For what purposes . Just completelyusrules on not i wanted to confirm point addressing the Minority Hearing today. If i hear t that one more time, of order is the rules of ill address that when were decorum. I dont believe the gentleman marking up impeachment articles. What is the use of a minority from florida meant to violate him andnt i want to give him to hearing day if youre going have benefit of o doubt. To hear evidence of the markup than once he referred if you get the confirmation of to a new york lawyer. If hek is prepared to explain what he meant, i will withdraw the master bedroomrkup yourself. My Point Of Order. Even the most heated development does not know show any way that that is not a recognizable Point Of Order. Mr. Chairman, ....
Our own ears. so mr. goldman, i d like your help in responding to some of the claims that my republican colleagues have made today. happily. the president and his allies say that there was no quid pro quo. in other words, they claimhe th the president wasn t withholding the aid in exchange for the manufactured political investigation. isn t it true that the aid was withheld andas that there has bn no logical explanation for the withholding of that aid? there is common sense that leads one to conclude that the aid was withheld for the investigations, and then there is also direct evidence in that the president s own words to ambassador sondland on september 7th said the same thing. thank you. president trump knew he had leverage over presidente zelensky, and in fact david holmes testified that ambassador sondland told president trump that president zelensky will, quote, do anything you ask him. ....