called? why did this interaction raise concern? well don witness tampering is serious. it s a crime, as miss cheney stated during the hearing we pass along this information to the doj to look into it further. we take very seriously the safety of any witnesses anyone who comes forward to the committee. likewise, their privacy in this case. any speculation about who this person might have been and a lot of people trying to tie it together. the committee will just say. we want to protect this witness. we also want to hold people accountable who have potentially broken a law. chairman thompson is telling cnn, the doj has been asking for testimony, from the committee, related to trump s fake elector scheme. is there enough evidence on this one issue to lead to a criminal indictment of trump? the committee is not the one who will determine the criminal indictment. that would be the department of justice. as we have said through the investigation, when we discover things, it s
on this call. why did this interaction have the committee so concerned? don, witness tampering is serious. it s a crime, and as ms. cheney stated during the hearing, we passed along this information to the department of justice to look into it further. we take very seriously. the safety of any witnesses, anyone who comes forward to the committee, and like wise their privacy. in this case any speculation who this person might have been and a lot of people trying to tie it together the committee may just say we want to protect this witness. but we also want to hold people accountable who have potentially broken the law. chairman thompson is telling cnn the doj has been asking for testimony from the committee related to trump s fake elector scheme. is there enough evidence on this one issue to lead to a criminal indictment of trump? well, the committee s not the one who s going to determine the criminal indictment. that would be the department of justice. so, you know, as
Just a quick the guidance, that s the problem. just a quick thought the guidance, that s the problem. just a quick thought on the guidance, that s the problem. just a quick thought on this - the guidance, that s the problem. just a quick thought on this one. i the guidance, that s the problem. i just a quick thought on this one. as you say, borisjohnson came in a very, very clear in his own mind that the inquiry had no evidence upon which to base the case. do you think something emerged during that three hour sequence that was evidence? do you think that has become clear now in a way it wasn t before? i become clear now in a way it wasn t before? ~ , , before? i think this is the thing that boris johnson before? i think this is the thing that boris johnson will- before? i think this is the thing that boris johnson will rely - before? i think this is the thing that boris johnson will rely on. | that boris johnson will rely on. there that boris johnson will rely on. there wasn t