groups who stormed the capitol directly to trump. but there wasn t a smoking gun there. i mean, correct me if i m wrong, is there something we can expect in the next hearing? are we missing something? i ll tell you when i said this when we went into the most recent hearing it s a ven diagram. you have these groups, encrypted communications between them, we had people who were from these different groups providing security to some of the people directly in the president s orbit. draw this ven diagram, how much more clearer does it need to be there was involvement and information flowing between these groups and people who had a significant influence on the president and his actions and his thoughts. i mean, we heard at length about this very heated conversation that went on in the white house. and, you know, i think all these things tied together will come into more clarity in the last
there wasn t a smoking gun there. correct me if i m wrong, is there something we can expect in the next hearing? are we missing something? i will tell you, i said this before we went into the most recent hearing. it s a venn diagram. you have these groups, these people are speaking to other people, we had crypt id communications between them. we had people from these different groups providing security to some people in the presidents orbit. like how much more clear doesn t need to be? that there was involvement. and information flowing, between these groups. and people who had significant influence on the president and his actions, and his thoughts. we heard at length about this very heated conversation that went on. in the white house, and i think all of these things tied together will come into more clarity, when we move into the last hearing. i will be cheering the last hearing with my colleague adam kinzinger. we will be focusing on that 187 minutes. the time from when the
adam, thank you move decisively against him. 0k, adam, thank you very much. adam fleming in downing street. with me now is jane merrick, policy editor at the i newspaper. also i m joined byjohn stevens, the deputy political editor of the daily mail as adama sane, these are by elections, not general elections but nonetheless they are significant test of public opinion and to what extent do you think that is where the real dangerfor extent do you think that is where the real danger for borisjohnson the real danger for boris johnson nice the real danger for borisjohnson nice because any prime minister is only as good as his or her election pulling power? i only as good as his or her election pulling power? pulling power? i think that is riuht. i pulling power? i think that is right. i mean, pulling power? i think that is right. i mean, these - pulling power? i think that is i right. i mean, these by-elections right. i mean, these by elections are onjune the 23rd and even though conse
everyone s pension funds because they are sort of blue dividend players. these type of taxes don t help that either so there is lots wrong with this. blue chip dividend payers. wrong with this. blue-chip dividend payers. dividend payers. striking the chancellor s dividend payers. striking the chancellor s announcement l dividend payers. striking the | chancellor s announcement is dividend payers. striking the - chancellor s announcement is all happening after the sue gray report. is that cynical timing in your opinion? does by chance and still have your support? has opinion? does by chance and still have your support? have your support? has had my throughout. have your support? has had my throughout, actually. have your support? has had my throughout, actually. we - have your support? has had my throughout, actually. we were l have your support? has had my l throughout, actually. we were all waiting throughout, actually. we were all waiting for the sue gray the postman w