Stay updated with breaking news from Them unverified. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Points that the democrats can make in there. maybe they will be able to challenge some of the facts you just laid out. we simply do not know because we have not seen the democratic memo. but, again, to this point, they have not challenged that fundamental point that the fisa court seems to have been mislead. again, as a reporter, if the democratic memo had something we don t know today, we have to be fair and balanced and say okay, here s another pete s of information. maybinformation another piece of information. told something beyond the dossier give them the confidence. sean: thank you for that update. big huge anniversary for conspiracy they rist chris matthews. kind of a good way. hadn t hotline straighthannity t ahead. ....
Warrant that was july. when you go to the october fisa application, you are right, it was unverified. a footnote that says may be political in nature does not mean it came from the clinton campaign and the dnc. correct. sean: that was withheld. it was known and its would withheld. here is the irony to me. james comey, this is in october. he is arguing that this should go before the fisa. he knows it s going before the fisa court. it s the bulk of information according to the grassly graham memo. ed: yeah. sean: then in january when he goes to see trump at trump tower is he still president-elect before the swearing. in is he telling trump it s unverified and salacious. couple months earlier saying something different. two reports. james comey is telling the president-elect at trump power january 2017 this dossier is unverified. even though if you rewind the tape as you say, back in october 2016, the fisa court judge, it s not made clear that it s unverified. ....
Quote: he has been crisscrossing eastern europe for more than six months to secure the purported compromising material from a different russian. so there is a lot of different information to take in here. let me try and connect these dots for you. u.s. intelligence officials paying $100,000 to a russian with purported ties to moscow. ends up giving them unverified, possibly fabricated anti-trump information. where that information is and where ho has that information we don t know. the cia is strongly denying the information being reported by the new york times and the intercept. and the nsa reportedly declined to provide a comment to the intercept. and on top of all of this, we are also learning that at least four other russians have been shopping around compromising information. by the way, i thought they liked trump. and long-time clinton friend cody shearer is literally going all over europe trying to dig up damaging dirt about president trump from a russian. here is what it all ....
Who would write a second fate newsot dossier, he s been crisscrossing eastern europe for more than six months to secure the purported kompromat, compromising material, from a different russian. there s a lot of information taken. let me try and connect these dots.u. u.s. intelligence officials paying $100,000 to a russian with purported ties to moscow ends up giving them unverified, possibly fabricated, anti-trump information. where that information is, who has thatas information, we don t know. the cia is strongly denying the information being reported by the new york times and the intercept. the p nsa reportedly declined to provide a comment. on top of all of this, we are also learning that at least four other russians have been shopping around compromising information. by the way, i thought they liked trump. longtime clinton friend cody shearer is literally going all over europe trying to dig up damaging dirt about president trump from a russian. here s what it means. ....
That s why that information has to be pure and clean. sean: the grassily graham memo says that the dossier was the bulk of information evidence and so they hand this over. now, three months later, you got james comey. right. saying to trump it s not verified and salacious. but it s only a foote note as we understand it to the fisa court. it may have political origins. they knew hillary bought it. they know she paid for it. they knew it was even probably not verified but they didn t tell the judge. what should happen now? well, the judge needs to bring them back before him. they should all be held in contempt at very minimum for bringing false information to a judge. that s more than lying by omission. they did not give the judge all the facts. i believe it was very falsified what they did. it needs to go back before the judge and needs to be wiped out. everything you always hear ....