Ambitions. Our selfrespect. Our love of freedom and the rule of law. Our fierce constitutional patriotism. Now, it looked like President Trump might get might get away with his ukraine shakedown. After all, most americans didnt know anything about it. And the few who learned of it would be too afraid, too intimidated to cross the most powerful man on earth. Fr President Trump could rest easy. But if donald trump misjudged the american character, the framers of our constitution did not. I count 17 honorable Public Servants who came forward to testify over the intimidation and disparagement of the president. Is that right, mr. Goldman . Yes, there were 17. And i count a dozen Career State Department and National Security officials who served republican and democratic president s alike, over decades, who came to testify. In fact, four of President Trumps own National Security councils staffers, hill,
vindman, morrison, and mcguyer, came forward to report trumps scheme to nsc lawyers as so
it s gabby, but they say the cause remains pending final autopsy results so what happens now, doctor? well, what happens is clearly they have now ruled out that there was any kind of accidental fall. they have ruled out any kind of heart disease or brain disease that s natural. they have ruled out a suicidal kind of death. we re left just with homicide. so they declared it a homicide. thelu object like a rock. possibly even stabbing. but they don t want to make a final judgment, it appears, until they get more tests back, especially the toxicologist test to see how the death certificate should be worded. if there is any drugs present. but they already know that this
the new york times reported that the whistle-blower, quote, approached a house intelligence aide with his concerns about mr. trump. thatut accurate? i m sorry? saye? that again? on october 2nd, the new york times reported that the whistle-blower approached a house intelligence committee aide with hisa concern about m trump. thatab accurate? i think the whistle-blower s concerns about president trump are from ws the threats no, that s not what i m asking. did the whistle-blower approach a house intelligence let me ask it a different way. have you had any communications with the whistle-blower? ca as i said earlier in respoe to questions from your colleagues, i m knotts going to get into so you re gurefusing to answer whether you veef communicated wh the whistle-blower. > the whistle-blower is not relevant to this report hi, see the whole basis of the beginning of this investigation. he is absolutely relevant. thelu whistle-blower s complaints for the reason mr. ca
well, sean, like we ve seen so many times over the last three years, every time house republicans on the intelligence committee come up with real information and put it out there, what do they do? they smear the messenger. the problem that cnn has this time and the daily beast, look, i understand the last week and a half, it was a disaster for them. it was a train wreck for them. what did they have to do? they have to come out and say, look, devin nunes was actually the one that was meeting with all of these ukrainians. so, sorry, cnn, it s totally false. so we put out a very clear statement after the story came out on friday night, saying it s demonstrably false, total fakene news. i will tell you, sean, for all of thelu last three years including the russia hoax to the ukraine hoax, this is the mother of all fake newss stories. there is not one bigger than