isn t in the constitution. and to get there, he has to change the rules of grammar by moving the well regulated militia, predecessor to the keep and bear arms section of the second amendment, to the back of the second amendment. and go right to this individual right of self-defense. and i think part of what he was doing was, if he made that claim, he would pick up the libertarian anthony kennedy. he would also pick up the libertarian clarence thomas. he d be able to hold his five vote majority. this book really gives you a better sense of what makes anthony scalia tick. the take away was that he s an incredibly intellectual guy. he also craves attention. we were talking about this. how it s interesting, as smart as he is, he s actually become more and more partisan as he gets older. how much of that well, first of all, how common is that for judges on the supreme court to seek that attention? but how much of that falls back to him just wanting people to follow him and to like him?