They wouldn t be aren t obliged to disclose anything they wouldn t be required - aren t obliged to disclose anything they wouldn t be required to - they wouldn t be required to disclose they wouldn t be required to disclose before they wouldn t be required to disclose before a they wouldn t be required to disclose before a court - they wouldn t be required to disclose before a court of. they wouldn t be required tol disclose before a court of law they wouldn t be required to - disclose before a court of law but private disclose before a court of law but private information disclose before a court of law but private information is disclose before a court of law but private information is disclosed l disclose before a court of law but| private information is disclosed to inquiries private information is disclosed to inquiries all private information is disclosed to inquiries all the private information is disclosed to inquiries all the time. private information is dis
At least one of his cabinet, the energy secretary grant shapps, seems not to be on board with that, saying this morning he believes the covid inquiry should be given whatever they wa nt as evidence gathering begins in two weeks time under the chairmanship of the right honourable baroness dame heather carol hallett. today s move from the government is believed to be the first time ever that ministers have taken legal action against an inquiry their own government has established. so where does all of this leave the covid inquiry? here s kate. what s relevant to the uk s pandemic response? that s the issue at the heart of the judicial review the government announced today. the cabinet office is challenging whether it should have to disclose what it considers unambiguously irrelevant material to the upcoming public inquiry, including parts of borisjohnson s whatsapp messages and diaries. the chair of the covid inquiry, baroness hallett, however, has previously found that the refusal to