streak that has characterized some of justice breyer s work. i think that she will be quite balanced. i have not found her to be an ideologue. she understands the job of being a judge or being a justice. she wants very much to do it in the right way. and she will bend her considerable talents to that direction and will not get i think the con truly appreciate that and that this is a woman that understands the importance of the position and will give 100% of her talents every day to do that job in the right way in accordance with her oath of office. unanimous consent that that be put into the record without objection? and finally the providence journal, the home state newspaper, j.d. mulvaney in an interview with her, i think it is a terrific appointment. she is a very thoughtful person. and wonderfully well-qualified. i m happy not only for her, but
0 christianity, judaism, islam, embraces traditional definition of marriage, correct? i am aware that there are various religious faiths that define marriage in a traditional way. do you see that when the supreme court makes a dramatic pronouncement about the invalidity of state marriage laws, that it will inevitably sit in conflict between those who ascribe to the supreme court s edict and those who have a firmly held religious belief that marriage is between a man and a woman? woman? well, senator, these issues are being litigated, as you know, throughout the courts as people raise issues. i am limited with what i can say about them. i m aware there are cases i m not asking you to decide a case or predict how you would decide to, i m just asking isn t it apparent that when the supreme court decides that something that is not even in the constitution is a fundamental right, and no state can pass any law that conflicts with the supreme court s edict, particularly in an area w