committee that he has agreed to respond in writing by the end of business on wednesday and he will brief lawmakers in a closed-door session in the coming weeks. he says he wants to hear more from holder so, quote, he can further clarify the actions of the justice department regarding the search department they obtained for james rosen s emails. american people and congress deserve answers and accountability from the attorney general. we expect to have all our questions answered completely. holder testified before the house judiciary committee on may 15th and was asked about the rosen leak investigation. this is what he told lawmakers. with regard to the potential prosecution of the press for the disclosure of material, that is not something i ve ever been involved or heard of or would think would be a wise policy. molly: department of justice followed up that james rosen was never prosecuted so his statement
thsh r their boar come. and find out how a unicorn made it through customs in turkey. and lastly, facebook fella, how one man s facebook landed him in shale. we re going to read the one you picked at the end of the show. after lots of back and forth, attorney general eric holder is willing to answer the house judiciary committee s questions. what does the committee hope to learn? we re going to talk to how judiciary committee member louis gohmert coming up live, next. and a 41-foot yart burst into flames in florida, leaving the crew with no choice but to jump the verizon share everything plan for small business
the house judiciary committee is saying it expects to get answers from eric holder next week concerning the investigation of force news reporter han did he n. molly. republican congressman bob goodlatt of virginia, the chair of the house judiciary committee has said attorney general eric holder has agreed to respond in writing by the end of business on wednesday and brief lawmakers in a closed door session in the coming weeks. specifically, the lawmakers want to know why holder seemed to tell the committee in mid-may that he did not approve an investigation into james owesen s e-mails, phone calls and comes and goingings, but then later said he, holder, did sign off on the warrant. this is regarding the search warrant they obtained from james