The D Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from The d case. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In The D Case Today - Breaking & Trending Today
the thugsjfi] and criminals areçócorrupting our justice system, xdhe s rallying his supporters as another legal probe, the special counsel criminal investigation intensifies.e1xdxdr i ll talk to trump s attorney joe tacopina and preet bharara. your platform should be banned. tiktok ceo faces bipartisan ( skepticism that the app may be used for spying by the chinese government. has indeed spied on americaná citizens? i don t think that spying is the right way to describ wit. can the biden adóilistration ban the most downloaded app on the planet?5a■xdw3lpe1lpe1ñri] fá and parental w3permission. as was, utah decidest( to target all of 5$%1■ media and becomes the first state in the nation to restrict how children use it.i] we have a responsibility to protect our young people. i ll talk to republi#pf governor spencer cox who signed this new law regardi consent for minors usq media apps. joining me for insight and e9 correspondent yamiche alcindor ....
Jeopardy, in fact, really leaned into it.xd his campaign made witch hunt signs in an effort to be featured prominently behind himá while he was speaking. the district attorney of new york under the auspices and direction of the department of q injustice in washington, dc dc, was investigating me for something that is not a crime, not a misdemeanor, not an affair.xdt( i never liked hors]@fñ prosecutorial misconduct is their new tool, and they re willing to use it at levels never used before.t(qñr when they go after me they re going after you. just a reminder, the xdfáfá manhattan da does not work forlp the department of justice. joining me now is joe tacopina mr. tacopina, welcome to meet the press. jf thçn&s, chuck, good morning.d why can your client, mr. trump, make that claim that ....
Lawyer took out a equityt( loanf his own money, paid money to someone hew3 didn t çóknow, to afford t($130,000 and didn t te the client aboutlp the legal agreement, and it s a freight if that s, in fact, the case.t(ñi look, we put in the if, in fact, that is the case.ñ?ayr $v chuck? no, i understand that. so what is it that you ve learned about this case that changes your point of view? the facts. the facts. that what i just said and i ll repeat it again, that this was personal expenditure and not campaign money. the hypothetical question posedó to me five years ago beforei]t( afe as so many legal experts go on ■ tv, and i was asked about this hypothetical question.f>i i responded wiu)6áp d i m reading the transcript. if that is, in fact the case, i start with it although you ....
Office. if there with were axd filin obligation, if he d taken tax obligation, if he d taken tax money, which he did nopá would be a crime.w3 if he had used campaign funds, we d have an argument here. this was a personal matter, and w3ok he called it legal fees th> they weren t. no, it s insane legal retainer ■ and it was legal fees by michael cohen who arranged it with his own money and took out a loan, resolved this without the president knowing and came back is not a bill in four times ou■ the amount and over the course of a year was paid off. what was he supposed to be put in his personal ledger?çóe1xdxd áuásvwhat would he putxd in payment for hush money to quiet an affair that i clyi1 had so my family doesn t get embarrassed? is that what he puts in his ledger? how about the third onkóumy■d shouldn txd it be the truth? chuck, chuck, ñichuck, would ....
Didn t read it in the clip, which, if that is, in fact the d case, when i mñr answering a hypothetical question without knowing the facts and i will respond how i think appropriate. now what i since learned is that there were no campaign funds used, that there was a legal invoice sent by a lawyer over the course of a year to cover these payments and more, and tze more importantly, that the campaign finance law is clear. bradley smith, former chairman of the fec, has come on and said clearly that there was no u campaign finance law involved here because his personal funds and the expevd9qui been made irrespective of the n■ campaign. those are facts i didn t have before me five years ago as a hypothetical question was posed to a legal expert on tv.i]i] all right. it sounds like you have a defense ready to go, but 5a■ probable. i mean, if you re a prosecutor, you re making these claims.çót( great.q show us your proof of it. it seems like there s enough at dispute here that actual ....