government had established probable cause of potential violation of three federal statutes. number one relates to the unlawful removal of government material. number two relates to the law prohibiting the destruction or concealment of documents to obstruct an investigation. number three, potentially the most explosive, the espionage act. the inventory of what the fbi seized includes around 20 boxes of items including four sets of top-secret documents, three sets of secret documents, and three sets of confidential documents. the list does not provide any more details about the substance of those documents or what might be in them. in addition, there was binders of photos, signatures of the former president, executive grant of clemency for roger stone and my personal favorite quote, info. re the president of france. can t wait to find out what that is. the vagueness of that inventory will leave people wondering exactly what exactly is in those boxes. there will be room for sp
that the property, mar-a-lago, is 58 bedrooms, 33 bathrooms, on a 17-acre estate. it s not a small place as we know. locations to be searched inside include 45 office, all storage rooms, and all other rooms or areas within the premises used or available to be used by f potus and his staff in which boxes or documents could be stored including all structures or buildings on the estate. all it basically says is the only place they can t go are things used by areas occupied, rented, or used by third parties, meaning mar-a-lago basically mar-a-lago members. so is that broad? is that unusually broad area to be able to search? or is it normal that a warrant like this would be more specific about, you know, here s this room, that room, the glove compartment, here s the safe you can look in, or is that common in terms of issuing these kinds of search warrants where you basically sort of blanket the whole residence and go wherever you want? so before answering that, i want to say a little
going on a tit-for-tat on adultery with michael. who cares? i don t think the american people care. correct. michael outplayed them. the reason being is all of trump world they were telling me we can t wait for michael to testify. this is a way to destroy the mueller investigation because he is not credible. michael documented everything in there factually about donald trump. he has handled the press very well. michael very smart at doing what he just did. that s why donald trump employed him all those years. he was a target of the mueller investigation. they asked me about roger stone. next questions were about michael cohen. my grand jury testimony was probably more about michael cohen than about roger stone. he was critical for the investigation because he was able to justify the mueller team getting into the southern district. is michael sympathetic be? no, read the charging memo. michael apparently did not tell the truth what he did from his
orrin hatch is on an island by himself when he says he does not care. look, the reason we re going through this is because while orrin hatch may not care and other members of congress may not care, the american people care. certainly, it s the case that people in the national security space care about whether or not crimes were committed and cooperation with russian operatives. so when i hear orrin hatch say that, it s the epitome of partisanship and kind of just kind of political jockeying. this is important. and orrin hatch of all people should care about what s happening here. let s see what happens just in the next hour, and we ll see what changes. great to see you all. thanks so much. coming up for us. how mad is president trump over the search for his new chief of staff? so mad that one source says that the president is, quote, super pissed. so why? stay with us. we ll tell you in a second. chan. that s why this is the view for every other full-size pickup. and this year, it
hasn t been completed yet, but what i will tell you is that the president has a commitment to making sure we fight the opioid crisis. one of the top three priorities i have identified for the department of health and human services. we were able to put out $485 million in grants to states two weeks ago. i m moving around the country this coming week to go to states where wez want to make sure where we want to make sure they re allowed and have the resources to address this opioid crisis. 33,000 deaths last year due to opioid overdose. we cannot tolerate that and the department of health and human services this is a priority. whether it s through the government i don t think the american people care. they care that we re addressing this opioid crisis in the most aggressive and effective manner possible. mr. secretary, thank you very much. we ll have to leave it there.