ecllc and/or david denison dd. doesn t the and/or mean that ec was capable in and of itselfc a. doesn t the and/or mean that ec was capable in and of itselfec lc and/or david denison dd. doesn t the and/or mean that ec was capable in and of itselflc . doesn t the and/or mean that ec was capable in and of itself at settles this action? no, because and/or is a ternlg of art in the legal profession and under california law, it is found to be a plural use of the term. it is in the conjunction difference. furthermore, if you look at paragraph 8.6 of the agreement, it specifies if the agreement is not signed by all parties, it is invalid. therefore i come back to where i began which is shouldn t she refuse to have taken the 130 k until there was full execution? well, i mean that certainly was an option. that is not what happened. and so we look at where we stand now and where we stand now is that we ve got an agreement that was never signed by all parties
supreme court s landmark ruling in which she said they wanted to allow detainees to challenge their decision, even though they don t want to hear the case. the court today also declined to debate jose padilla s appeal. he is the u.s. citizen and al qaeda recruit who president bush declared an enemy come want tant and con voifblgtd terrorism and said he was tore dmurd a navy brig. here with today s developments and what too expect with the health care law, we start with supreme court correspondent mike sacks, producer of huff post live. what do we need to understand about what it implies for the future and we will come back to the other decisions? health care will happen tend of the ternlg the last weekend or the last week in june. so, going to be either monday, june 25th, or if the court decides the ad hoc schedule another day that would be probably thursday, june 28th. then fireworks will happen.