And dressed in fairness radin, we should have actually been dressed, but as it turned out , well, this is also a powerful tool, a powerful tool, of course, influencing people, well , really, because the oscar, which the whole world is watching and so on, and we watched before recently, they have a whole series of such special nominations , which are designed, as i understand it, designed, so to speak, to attract some attention or, so to speak, not to allow it to fade away in some direction in some country, lets say with everything. Respect for Nikita Sergeevich mikhalkov , and i sincerely respect him, i consider him a great artist, by the way, a russian and a great director, but i think that in many ways the oscar of 1995 was due to the fact that, well, russia, russia it was , so to speak, this was the topic then, it was a good topic, an important topic, so it is not accidental, it is not accidental that Nikita Sergeevichs oscar is not only because the film is great, but because there
that is testimony from mike pence s former adviser regarding former president donald trump s repeated efforts to get pence to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. we will hear much more of the key moments from yesterday s january 6th hearing, including the vice president s close call with the mob, very close call that day. and the pardon request from the architect of the president s election scheme. plus, new reporting that the house select committee now wants to talk to conservative activist ginni thomas. she is, of course, the wife of supreme court justice clarence thomas. good morning. welcome to morning joe. it is friday, june 17th. along with joe and me, we have white house bureau chief at politico and the host of way to too early, jonathan lemire. washington post s jackie alemany. host of politicians nation and host of the national action network, reverend al sharpton. and nbc legal analyst joyce vance. good morning to everybody. joe, anothe
Dissatisfied primarily because they simply, like many people who have psychological problems there, and each of us faces, cannot directly say what they want, and why so, that is, for them it is primarily a political moment of pressure, maybe its clear what they want, maybe they want money, well, just straight up its a shame to ask, because in fact you have to understand that in. All, these are protests of people who are protesting with quite good equipment, have very small volumes of production, and they invest in crops that do not bring much profit on such small areas, there, for example, the same corn, but this, again, this is not an issue that even i have the right to discuss, because it is internal polish politics, another matter, that ah. Really these farmers clearly understand those protesting, not those engaged in trade with ukraine, c trade with other countries, in the large agrarian, large agrarian sector that is in poland, the part that protests is mostly people, farmers, who
Are discussing is rather a discussion about what are the problems within the European Union, what are the problems in us and how do they interact with each other, and do they interact constructively, do they spark, and we have several products there, because they are really at your fingertips you can count on one hand how many of us really have certain, certain sensitive moments, but in. And each, each of them has its own story, its own perspective, and in fact, from this plane, everything is fine with us, worse with in the plane of such political and, that is , tradeeconomic, politicaleconomic, and this issue of protests is in poland, in the European Union, and here of agrarian protests, and here we can say that we have also achieved our goal. Because from the point of view of rational trade, from the point of view of associations that are involved in constant trade, everything is fine here, and the polish associations support us, which in principle has already become the subject of d
with a funding gap of £500 million. the result has been a series of budget cuts, the latest of which hit the news division on wednesday. although more money is being put into digitaljournalism and some broadcast services are being expanded the news at one doubling in length to an hour, for instance elsewhere, savings are being made. newsnight is losing half its staff, shortening its duration, and instead of the current magazine format with filmed reports and investigations, will become an interview, debate and discussion show. gabriel gatehouse, a former correspondent on the programme, had this response. but viewer david wright pointed out. while terry pearson questioned the thinking behind this week s changes. well, we ll be discussing the logic behind wednesday s announcement in a moment. but first, if this is the end of newsnight as we know it, what exactly is being lost without any dedicated correspondents and i should say, i was one of them in the 1990s or a bud