Of election fraud. Lets run through extracts of that call starting with the debunked claims from the former president about suitcases of ballots the president also made claims about so called dead voters. Brad raffensperger did push back in his call with President Trump heres a series of further extracts. And in the most explicit part of the call trump spelled out how many voters he needed. Stephen loosley an analyst in us politics at the United States studies centre in sydney laid out the legal dilemmas mr trump now faces. Its a very serious indictment for a number of reasons. Firstly, it is Racketeering Charge under Georgia State law and racketeering legislation is modelled on the Originalfederal Legislation is modelled on the original federal legislation that was designed to bring down the mafia. The problem that donald trump faces is generally a conviction under legislation in georgia leads to a prison sentence, it is not certain that is the probability. Secondly, mark meadows, th
Call starting with the claims from the former president about suitcases full of ballots. Mr trump also made claims about so called dead voters. Mr raffensperger did push back against mr trump in the call. And in the most pointed exchange,of the call trump spelled out how many voters he needed. Stephen loosley an analyst in us politics at the United States studies centre in sydney laid out the legal dilemmas mr trump now faces. It isa it is a very serious indictment for a number of reasons. Firstly, it is a number of reasons. Firstly, it is a Racketeering Charge under Georgia State law, Racketeering Legislation is modelled on the originalfederal legislation designed to bring down the mafia. The problem that donald trump faces is generally a conviction under legislation in georgia leads to a prison sentence, Thatis Georgia leads to a prison sentence, that is not certain, but that is the probability, secondly, mark meadows, the former chief of staff in the Trump White House is amongst the
journalist, anyone who has a reason for that level of privacy but everybody. nobody wants people reading the messages. what the tech company say is there is no tech solution, they either break the encryption and weaken privacy for everyone or they remain unable to view the messages which is of course not what the government is going to incest if it thinks it s necessary. 7 incest if it thinks it s necessary. ? can you talk us through some of the measures to really start dealing with this issue? either the encryption is broken and they built a back door which means they can access these messages that they need to, once there is a back door, there is a back door and it s only a matter of time before someone else finds it. it will not only be the good guys who are using it. that could leave the entire platform exposed to malicious use once it is discovered. the other option is something called client side scanning, putting software onto a
they are is a child safety concern. currently, they cannot do that, it is impossible, many of the most popular apps like whatsapp run on end to end encryption so if i send you a message, only my phone and your phone read the message. meta which owns whatsapp cannot see the message itself. other platforms says it is a privacy service that is popular with people and protects vulnerable people, victims of domestic abuse, political activists working in countries where their views could be dangerous for them, journalists, anyone who has a reason for that level of privacy but everybody. nobody wants people reading the messages. what the tech company say is there is no tech solution, they either break the encryption and weaken privacy for everyone or they remain unable to view the messages which is of course not what the government is going to insist if it thinks it s necessary.