hey, everyone, it is 4:00 in new york. the question of when donald trump s rhetoric crosses the line was a subject of a bit of a lips as pivotal court hearing. prosecutors and attorneys met in front of a three-judge panel in the u.s. court of appeal for a d.c. circuit for oral arguments. the substance was the validity of a gag order imposed on the ex-president that limits what donald trump can say in public about prosecutors, witnesses, and court staff. the heart of arguments, how do you balance the first amendment rights of a defendant who was also a former president and front runner with the need to protect prosecutors, witnesses, and prevent the railing of the justice system? trump s attorney was grilled by the judges for more than an hour, judges pushed back, that they had no right to step in with a gag order. essentially what they are finding is we have a past pattern when the defendant speaks on this subject, threats follow. now he s making similar statements again
anger at the fact that the biden administration has created an absolute calamity at our border. but recognize that your inability to work as a team inability to pass rules inability to allow speaker to negotiate is what has weakened his hand to try to get border provisions in this bill. and that is the frustration that i have. you know, i voted for a cr that had hr2 in september. many of the people complaining today calling for speaker johnson s removal are the same people that volted against a cr that had border provisions that would have put biden administers and chuck schumer on defensive so they have nobody to blame but themselveses for their failure to work as a collective. and recognize that you know what there s going to be compromises. apparently some of them don t understand marriage because any of us who have been married understand you re never going get your way 100% of the time.
often as passionate and commitment, and often when as passionate and commitment, and often when women are emotional it is seen as often when women are emotional it is seen as a often when women are emotional it is seen as a weakness, and i really wish seen as a weakness, and i really wish work seen as a weakness, and i really wish work would have been done to dil wish work would have been done to dig into wish work would have been done to dig into what he is saying because when dig into what he is saying because when you dig into what he is saying because when you suffer a defeat like that and you when you suffer a defeat like that and you want to blame your players, ithink and you want to blame your players, i think it and you want to blame your players, i think it would be who people to look at i think it would be who people to look at matches, is what he is saving look at matches, is what he is saying correct or not? if it isn t correct saying correct or n