I dont remember that one. Supervisor kim mr. Frey. My ris recollection is only e waller Street Project is the only one with a 10year limitation. Supervisor kim okay. And that was actually a significant reduction, at 59 in terms of their property assessed value. Okay. These two projects are slightly lower in their reduction rate. For me on a level of consistency i would move both of those items forward with the 10year limit and that would be my recommendation to have the Property Owners come back again to explain additional costs or rehabilitation at that time. So that will be the amendment that i will be making on these two on these two items. So before we take a motion to do that, were going to open up these two items for Public Comment . Any members of the public that would like to speak on items 4 and 5 . PackagPublic Comment is now clo. Colleagues on item 4 and 5, can we take a motion to move those forward with recommendation, amending it with a 10year term for the mills act exempt
Supervisor kim thank you, mr. Frey. If maybe the Committee Members can remind me of the three that we forwarded with recommendation to the full board, 101 , and 940 grove and 637 waller, did we limit all three of those to a tenure mill is act . Supervisor breed i dont think that we did all three, the 940 grove i pushed for no limit, and i cant recall exactly i think that waller was a limit and what was the other one . I dont remember that one. Supervisor kim mr. Frey. My ris recollection is only e waller Street Project is the only one with a 10year limitation. Supervisor kim okay. And that was actually a significant reduction, at 59 in terms of their property assessed value. Okay. These two projects are slightly lower in their reduction rate. For me on a level of consistency i would move both of those items forward with the 10year limit and that would be my recommendation to have the Property Owners come back again to explain additional costs or rehabilitation at that time. So that wil
And that was actually a significant reduction, at 59 in terms of their property assessed value. Okay. These two projects are slightly lower in their reduction rate. For me on a level of consistency i would move both of those items forward with the 10year limit and that would be my recommendation to have the Property Owners come back again to explain additional costs or rehabilitation at that time. So that will be the amendment that i will be making on these two on these two items. So before we take a motion to do that, were going to open up these two items for Public Comment . Any members of the public that would like to speak on items 4 and 5 . PackagPublic Comment is now clo. Colleagues on item 4 and 5, can we take a motion to move those forward with recommendation, amending it with a 10year term for the mills act exemptions . Supervisor breed so moved. Supervisors, so the way that these will work as with the waller item is that the board may approve the mills act agreement which has
Terms of their property assessed value. Okay. These two projects are slightly lower in their reduction rate. For me on a level of consistency i would move both of those items forward with the 10year limit and that would be my recommendation to have the Property Owners come back again to explain additional costs or rehabilitation at that time. So that will be the amendment that i will be making on these two on these two items. So before we take a motion to do that, were going to open up these two items for Public Comment . Any members of the public that would like to speak on items 4 and 5 . PackagPublic Comment is now clo. Colleagues on item 4 and 5, can we take a motion to move those forward with recommendation, amending it with a 10year term for the mills act exemptions . Supervisor breed so moved. Supervisors, so the way that these will work as with the waller item is that the board may approve the mills act agreement which has a 10year term and can be terminated by the city at its
I dont remember that one. Supervisor kim mr. Frey. My ris recollection is only e waller Street Project is the only one with a 10year limitation. Supervisor kim okay. And that was actually a significant reduction, at 59 in terms of their property assessed value. Okay. These two projects are slightly lower in their reduction rate. For me on a level of consistency i would move both of those items forward with the 10year limit and that would be my recommendation to have the Property Owners come back again to explain additional costs or rehabilitation at that time. So that will be the amendment that i will be making on these two on these two items. So before we take a motion to do that, were going to open up these two items for Public Comment . Any members of the public that would like to speak on items 4 and 5 . PackagPublic Comment is now clo. Colleagues on item 4 and 5, can we take a motion to move those forward with recommendation, amending it with a 10year term for the mills act exempt