Speeds. These are important fixes to make some of the highest speed streets in our city closest to our most beloved park more safe for people walking. It clearly this project clearly falls into a categorical exemption from a full environmental review. It is clearly minor. And a reversal of the exemption would really set a bad precedent, forcing full reviews on traffic calming projects, even small scale fixes like bulbouts as well as other Sustainable Design improvements. A reversal would delay not only these current improvements that are muchneeded as the previous speaker said on fell and oak, but critical projects in the future. We need safer streets sooner, not with more delays. So thank you very much. Good evening, supervisors. My name is jason henderson, im with the hayes valley neighborhood association. The hvna enthusiastically endorsed this project and we ask that you reject this appeal. Ive participated in multiple meetings on this project. There was a thorough public process.
The general direction, and particularly with ceqa, is to look at the regional air quality and the regional Greenhouse Gas emissions. The way you do that is to reduce the vehicle miles traveled. This is the kind of project that gets you to your 20 most good evening, supervisors. My name is morgan fits gibbons here on behalf of the wig party. We work to make the wiggle more sustainable and resilient. Im here to make a couple of points on behalf of the hundreds and hundreds of people in our organization that live in the neighborhood. The first point has already been mentioned is that this plan was born through a terribly Expensive Community process, and kudos to the mta for leading a great process. So this is definitely the will of the people. People want their bike lanes on fell and oak. The second point is from may to october, a full five months, the only thing that was happening on this project was the Planning Department was addressing this very issue of the Environmental Impact repor
Her gutsy vote for sheriff Ross Mirkarimi to go back to work as sheriff of this city. Christina olague, you were appointed into the position. You took a risk, and i admire you for your principle, rather than the Political Part of it. Thank you very much. And i wish you all the very best. And im so glad i was here tonight because i heard a lot of wonderful things. Ive never talked top pu ive never met you. Ive never even crossed the aisle with you, you know, anywhere. So thank you so much. And i wish you all the very best. And supervisor kim, i was very much surprised. Thank you for your vote. Supervisor avalos and supervisor campos, i always thought, from the very beginning, because all we needed was just two supervisor votes, to bring him back as sheriff. Thank you so very much. And im asked one of the sheriffs here this evening, i think hes gone now, how is sheriff Ross Mirkarimis doing, and he said hes doing wonderfully. I am very happy to hear that. I wish him, his wife, and their
The hvna enthusiastically endorsed this project and we ask that you reject this appeal. Ive participated in multiple meetings on this project. There was a thorough public process. Density has been mentioned. The real problem that we acknowledge in hayes valley is the density of cars is the real problem, not the density of people. In fact, were disappointed that the fell and oak project didnt reduce a lane and look at the whole corridor. But thats another matter and we understand compromise. And so removing the parking was the compromise. And theres no Significant Impact on automobile intersection level of service, as much as i would like us to get away from using that metric, i do understand that metric and this project has thoroughly looked at that. Therefore, there is no impact on transit, the 16x. The impacts on pedestrians is only positive. So theres no significant Environmental Impact there. And the impacts on bicycles is only positive. So theres no Significant Impact there. Some
Not with more delays. So thank you very much. Good evening, supervisors. My name is jason henderson, im with the hayes valley neighborhood association. The hvna enthusiastically endorsed this project and we ask that you reject this appeal. Ive participated in multiple meetings on this project. There was a thorough public process. Density has been mentioned. The real problem that we acknowledge in hayes valley is the density of cars is the real problem, not the density of people. In fact, were disappointed that the fell and oak project didnt reduce a lane and look at the whole corridor. But thats another matter and we understand compromise. And so removing the parking was the compromise. And theres no Significant Impact on automobile intersection level of service, as much as i would like us to get away from using that metric, i do understand that metric and this project has thoroughly looked at that. Therefore, there is no impact on transit, the 16x. The impacts on pedestrians is only p