Ch ctatui permit the state to disqualify an insurrectionist mr. Mitchell that is correct. So Justice Sotomayor under se yoqu s on thing i would Justice Sotomayor it is rare under the fourteenth amendment. Mr. Mitchell oh, of course, it situation. And, your honor, the only thing im ju thdefine selfexecuting. Reca and griffins case doesnt justice so nllryhtusvi y, ll so o nonprecedential case by a justice who later takes back what he said. Higr70, when it first provided an enfomaidot tci mr. Mitchell and the thefi T Unless Congress gives noe on you want us to credit as precedential . 1870 established the justice non tin congress acted after griffins case mr. Mitchell yes. Justice kagan thats g y in er itce e kait better, suppose that we took all of that way away. You know, suppose there were no griffins case and there were no he ovinett wnds imonis akist under section iii, and that was Justice Barrett well, why do you needo getting at is why dont yo owe it tarbles case kind of way. Mr. M
Colorado Supreme Court ruling saying the formeprident was ineligible to run for office agn because of his actions leading to the january 6 attack onhe. S. Capitol. Corado voters who argued the former president engaged in be president under section 3 the 14th amendment. We bring you that oral argument which is just over two hours. L e 23719 trump v anderson. Mr. Mitchell . Mr. Ll mr. Chief justice and may it please the court. E colorado Supreme Court held that president donald j. Trump is constitutionally disqualified rving as president under ion 3 of the 14th amendment. The coloupreme courts decision is wrong and should be reversed for numerous ndent reasons. The first reason is that President Trump is not covered by section 3 because the prt is not an officer of the United States as that term is used throughout the constitution. In both situations a state is accelerated the deadline to meet the deadline of the constitutionally imp qualificat and is therefore violatinholding of term li