housekeeping. have you been speaking, interchanging with the mueller team? is there any news about whether or not the president will answer more questions? we told them six weeks ago that we would not take anymore questions. that was at the time we found out a lot of very disturbing things about how they ve conducted themselves, including one today that s devastating to mueller. and basically, you know, destroying the 19,000 texts that were all done during the period of time of the mueller investigation. every single one of his text messages has been destroyed by mueller s people. well, just to get the facts straight, mr. mayor, you said something i don t think you meant. they recovered 19,000 texts no, they ve also from strzok and page. they ve also not been able to recover an equal number. how many do they know they couldn t recover? well, they re assuming. it s actually between 9 and 19,000, if you want to be specific. and we don t have those. and those are the one
it. unless they surprise me and they do a fair report, which i m hoping to god they do. and you heard what mr. barr said yesterday about bob mueller, right? he cannot imagine him doing anything that would justify removing him or improper conduct. do you agree with that about bob mueller? no, i would not say i cannot imagine. i would say that the president has not removed him and this whole idea of obstruction is really stupid because the investigation has come to an end and nobody has obstructed it. i don t think the investigation has come to an end. look how much was redacted in those manafort papers if it hasn t come to an end, it s certainly come to an end on collusion. they either have it or don t have it. how do you know? we just learned the manafort stuff and that s the most damning that s not collusion and hacking the dnc. but that s not the bar. that is the bar! that s, are you doing something no. look at the mandate. it doesn t just say crimes pinpoint
prison, he did it while he was outside. that s why they put him in prison, even though they could have taped him, they could have put a monitoring on him. that s what s usually done by fair prosecutors. not by andrew weismann, who several times has been caught doing this to other people and been abraded by courts. and mueller went and hired him, an act of supreme bad judgment. the prosecutors are not bad guys when you re looking at the context of go look at weismann s record, my friend. but rudy, i always want to stick with the facts in front of my face in these circumstances. i don t judge people by their past. it s what you did here. it s what s going on here. what s going on here is an investigation that should be reported on now, it s gone far enough. let s see if he s got anything. i challenge him to show us some evidence that the president was involved in anything approaching criminal conduct. no. so if you want to do an ethics investigation, fine. do an ethics investig
for by hillary clinton and the dnc. $1.1 million. that it was a phony document. they did not think it was a phony document. how about, it put cohen at places he wasn t. and that may have been wrong. but there were a lot of different memoranda in it that had different sourcing and some of it was right, some of it wasn t. there is not a single piece of that document that has been substantiated. that s not true. strzok testified to that. strzok did not testify to that. lisa page testified to that. she certainly did. they were testifying on the idea that it was the soul premise of the investigation. you had nothing else. this is what your fisa application was. no. no, no. this is all you had. and they said, that s not true. you know what it was? it was a completely fraudulent affidavit. because the affidavit fails to mention that the dossier on which the case was based, at least in part, whether it s whole or in part, it was a false statement. it did not say to the
the work. that s totally ridiculous! when somebody because you don t like it? that s totally ridiculous! when somebody says, i hate that person, as a prosecutor, i m not putting him in charge of that investigation. that is sick. i hear you. that is a sick, totally biased statement! you tell me you would like to be investigated by someone who hates you? i wouldn t want to be investigated by anybody and it was the right move to remove them. do you think it s fair to have somebody investigating the president of the united states who has expressed opinions hating him? only after he they found out. only after he started the investigation. and the inspector general said that that work was not only after he submitted the false affidavit. mr. mayor he had done tremendous damage by the time he did that. the amount of false reporting about this case is despicable! mr. mayor, false reporting is saying that nobody in the campaign had any contacts with russia.