Warrants . The concern grows out of the fact that all of the failures and the and The Information that shouldved been given and wasnt given. And the question being what was the intent . What what washa their intention . Their motivation there. And what we determined was we couldnt definitively say what the motivation was. Are these pretty smart people . Fairly welleducated . At least welleducated. I dont know if theyre smart. I dont know if were very smart to beow honest with you. I was b going to say they have law degrees, right . At least somehe of them do. So you think the woods review for people at this level of the organization. To be clear, the stuff that didnt happen on the woods review was basic stuff. Yeah. You didnt need to be a deeplyexperienced fbi agent to be able to do it the right way. Well, thats my point. So wouldnt you think that would almost be muscle p memory for people who are going through this process to know they had an obligation to go through that . They clear
luckily the campaign had minimal impact and was sloppy in its execution. to no one s surprise it remains active on elon s x. but this is only the tip of the iceberg in terms of alleged interference. the joint investigation by the guardian and the israel-based magazines 972 and local call, reveals how israel ran an almost decade-long secret war against the international criminal court. the country deployed its intelligence agency to surveil, hack, pressure, smear and allegedly threatened senior icc staff in an effort to derail inquiries and dissuade the icc from filing war crimes charges against israeli officials. israeli intelligence captured communications of numerous icc officials including the current prosecutor and his prosecutor predecessor. surveillance was ongoing in recent months, providing benjamin netanyahu with
general says about that meanwhile, the letter that i just read, kaitlan also spread some baseless conspiracy theories, including the quote investigations have pointed to the fbi s possible involvement in facilitating think the events of january 6 there s no evidence of that, of course, in fact, the fbi informants were trying to stop the violence. there. that s why they were there but as the alleged source for these republicans, the letter cited a new york post article about the fbi informants who were sent to the stop, the steal rally, two surveil what the violent trump s supporters were up to so again how exactly our republicans threading this this is one of those things, allison, where republicans keep pushing this idea and it just is not being borne out in the facts the fbi director has said that was not what happened happened on january 6. there have been hundreds of successful prosecutions. people pleading guilty who took part in those attacks and
and i would be fascinated to hear them speak, how they reached this verdict. but the verdict leapt over a lot of history and expectation here. and i think it is obviously, the conviction is a big moment. but this undermining of the system where somebody like trump could protect himself, i mean, to be direct, it s the boys club. and the boys club got shoved in the back room yesterday. journalism has an interplay with law enforcement. they the police, the prosecutors, the fbi if it is federal, they can t surveil and track everything.
in the back room yesterday. journalism has an interplay with law enforcement. the police, the prosecutors, the fbi if it s federal, they can t surveil and track everything so, as you know, there is an interplay and sometimes it goes one way or the other and who is finding information first. this, now convicted felony crime, bob, started with donald trump s effort to control and subvert media information through a tabloid that ultimately was exposed by journalists and then investigated both by the feds and now new york. your thoughts on that and is it important we continue to have independent investigative journalists who aren t looking at this through a party lines, but who are creating the information reservoir that then the system can assess?